arantxa Posted 22 November , 2020 Share Posted 22 November , 2020 Walking dig at Herstmonceux Cadtle sussex these were in the woods what are they Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arantxa Posted 22 November , 2020 Author Share Posted 22 November , 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawryleslie Posted 22 November , 2020 Share Posted 22 November , 2020 (edited) How many are there, how high are they and how far apart? At first glance I would say they are land boundary markers, possibly military but not necessarily. The NO possibly initials of land owner? Edited 22 November , 2020 by Lawryleslie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlesPeter Posted 22 November , 2020 Share Posted 22 November , 2020 Herstmonceux as part of the Royal Observatory was under the control of the Admiralty from 1946 and the land boundary markers almost certainly date from then with the anchor indicating which branch of the services controlled the land. You can find similar at many naval establishments. CPK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 22 November , 2020 Share Posted 22 November , 2020 48 minutes ago, Lawryleslie said: How many are there, how high are they and how far apart? At first glance I would say they are land boundary markers, possibly military but not necessarily. The NO possibly initials of land owner? Possibly Naval Ordnance (1891 till 1958) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawryleslie Posted 22 November , 2020 Share Posted 22 November , 2020 53 minutes ago, CharlesPeter said: Herstmonceux as part of the Royal Observatory was under the control of the Admiralty from 1946 and the land boundary markers almost certainly date from then with the anchor indicating which branch of the services controlled the land. You can find similar at many naval establishments. CPK Yes of course Charles makes complete sense. Around here the old Royal Naval sea firing range at Wembury Point has similar boundary stones marked "WP" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulkheader Posted 22 November , 2020 Share Posted 22 November , 2020 We have them around at least 2 sites here on the Island, both sites previously coastal battery’s. Ours are numbered and marked ‘WD’ and the crows foot. T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arantxa Posted 22 November , 2020 Author Share Posted 22 November , 2020 Gosh thank you how interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelS Posted 23 November , 2020 Share Posted 23 November , 2020 On 22/11/2020 at 12:55, caulkheader said: We have them around at least 2 sites here on the Island, both sites previously coastal battery’s. Ours are numbered and marked ‘WD’ and the crows foot. T There's a small group with the anchor around the site that used be occupied by the Admiralty signal station on Culver Down (now mainly a car park) near the Yarborough Monument on the IOW, as well as many with the more familiar broad arrow mark in the same area. Living near Aldershot, Pirbright & Deepcut you can't go far in this area without encountering the broad arrow type with some being more noticeable than others. Although not the case with Herstmonceux Castle, they can quite often be found marked - although not to be confused with the similarly arrow marked survey 'benchmarks' - on the large scale (6 & 25") OS Maps . These are the 1907 revisions for Culver Down (the 25" version even gives the stones' numbers): 6" https://maps.nls.uk/view/101442387 (coastline centre) 25" https://maps.nls.uk/view/105990772 (bottom right) An interesting feature of these maps, or rather non-feature - almost certainly for security reasons - is that although the giveaway boundary stones are shown, Bembridge Fort (A Palmerston Fort dating back to the 1860s) & the nearby Culver Battery (dating back to 1902) aren't. (compare with the 1960's https://maps.nls.uk/view/189249665 map on which the fort is clearly marked, and although not identified as such, the battery & its ancillary buildings, which were no longer active by then, can be found at the eastern end of the track above the 'Culver Down' legend.) NigelS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulkheader Posted 24 November , 2020 Share Posted 24 November , 2020 Some of our local examples. First 2 from area around Fort Victoria, near Yarmouth. 3rd from Culver Down [Bembridge Fort] area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NigelS Posted 24 November , 2020 Share Posted 24 November , 2020 Unless I'm mistaken, the first is the one on the Coastal Path a little to the east of the Bouldnor Battery; I've walked past this one many times but hadn't notice the 'BOUNDRY' misspelling until now. NigelS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulkheader Posted 25 November , 2020 Share Posted 25 November , 2020 8 hours ago, NigelS said: Unless I'm mistaken, the first is the one on the Coastal Path a little to the east of the Bouldnor Battery; I've walked past this one many times but hadn't notice the 'BOUNDRY' misspelling until now. NigelS You are quite correct, we had to do a fair bit of ‘gardening’ (cutting back the grass and a hard brush of the stone) before we took the shot. We always joke that the mason ran out of space when carving boundary! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOSEB Posted 30 November , 2020 Share Posted 30 November , 2020 The gun emplacements on Steep Holm Island in the Bristol Channel have similar markers to show the extent of WD land around them. They were not really needed as the island is only about half a mile long and the whole place was basically WD property. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now