Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Pte vs rifleman - what is the difference ?


Guest

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this has been asked  before  and seems a stupid thing to ask - I'm new to this forum

I'm investigating  a relative who was in the rifle brigade  and died in WW1 . The medals I have of his list him as Pte  F Merry but  his name on the Thiepval memorial list  him as Rifleman  Frederick Merry , The service number is the same so I know it is the right person. Which is correct and is there a difference between the 2 ranks ? 

Also is there a simple way to find out more about him eg service record/photos of regiment to show him  etc ?

 

Mark 

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Private was correct for WW1, the exceptions being Gunner or Driver for the RHA,RFA and RGA, Sapper for the Royal Engineers, Driver for the ASC.
Titles such as Rifleman, Guardsman, Fusilier, Kingsman etc were authorised post war and thus appear on memorials and headstones.

Private inscribed on the medal is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

add pioneer RE, and possibly [I am being idle] trooper for Household Cavalry.

 

Essentially sappers were better qualified and paid than pioneers RE.

 

Troopers were also horses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Muerrisch said:

add pioneer RE, and possibly [I am being idle] trooper for Household Cavalry.

 

Essentially sappers were better qualified and paid than pioneers RE.

 

Troopers were also horses!

Quite right and troop ships were also referred to as "troopers".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Rifleman' was used as an alternative to 'Private' in Rifle battalions during the Great War. Many wartime records refer to the rank.

Edited by Ken Lees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Men in the Rifle Brigade were always known as Rifleman since 1800, officialdom dictates otherwise.

 

4th & 7th Rifle Brigade, overseas 18/6/15.

 

He was in "B" Company, killed on a working party by a shell.

 

Andy

Edited by stiletto_33853
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great to see the Old Favourites coming around again!

 

AO 222 of 1923 brought 'officialdom' into line with actual regimental practice:

 

spacer.png

 

See also ...

2005 - guardsman or private

2018 - Guardsman or Private

2018 - Private to Rifleman in the KRRC

 

 ... which include this 'official' Proceedings on Discharge Army Form from 1915 posted by Andy ...

 

spacer.png

 

I still have not got hold of the text for AO 160 of 1909 though!

 

Mark

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...