Perth Digger Posted 25 November , 2019 Share Posted 25 November , 2019 Capt Stephen Hugh Van Neck's award of the MC was reported in the London Gazette on 1 January 1918. He served in the 23rd London Regiment (wounded at Festubert at the same time as his brother in 1915), but I think he was on the staff from mid-1916. Is there somewhere I can find a citation explaining why and how he won the MC? Thanks Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helpjpl Posted 25 November , 2019 Share Posted 25 November , 2019 The 1918 New Year MC. Awarded to soldiers who had distinguished themselves in war service and not for a specific action: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1918_New_Year_Honours_(MC) JP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrewer Posted 25 November , 2019 Share Posted 25 November , 2019 (edited) Not an answer to your question, but it might be interesting...SH Van Neck on the left of the photo, the chap on the far right is C Van Neck (Cousin?) taken apparently when they were both in the 1/23 London Regt. His brothers Charles Hylton and Philip were both killed in October 1914. S H survived to become the Chief Constable of Norfolk in 1928. He led the funeral procession from Sandringham for King George V . What appears to be the same gents in 1938. Edited 25 November , 2019 by sadbrewer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeignGong Posted 25 November , 2019 Share Posted 25 November , 2019 His MVO 4th Cl https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/34518/supplement/3691 His CVO https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/38161/supplement/9 His Officer St John https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/39433/supplement/138 Quite a line up of Gongs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perth Digger Posted 26 November , 2019 Author Share Posted 26 November , 2019 Many thanks for the answers. I'd seen the photos but hadn't noticed how similar the two were in appearance. I hadn't seen the gongs. They were brothers whose lives after Festubert went in different directions. Stephen made his name in the police force; Clare (sic) married an American gold digger and socialite who left him to marry (and divorce) the Duke of Leinster. Clare remarried, Stephen never married (as far as I can tell). The family name was Neck, but each boy was given the last forename of Van and this was used as part of the surname as they grew up. An interesting way of increasing the social cachet of the family. I wonder if the cousins the Lee Steeres did the same thing. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helpjpl Posted 26 November , 2019 Share Posted 26 November , 2019 A portrait: https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/captain-stephen-hugh-van-neck-cvo-mc-chief-constable-norfolk-19281956-66 JP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perth Digger Posted 26 November , 2019 Author Share Posted 26 November , 2019 Thanks JP. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadbrewer Posted 26 November , 2019 Share Posted 26 November , 2019 7 hours ago, Perth Digger said: Many thanks for the answers. I'd seen the photos but hadn't noticed how similar the two were in appearance. I hadn't seen the gongs. They were brothers whose lives after Festubert went in different directions. Stephen made his name in the police force; Clare (sic) married an American gold digger and socialite who left him to marry (and divorce) the Duke of Leinster. Clare remarried, Stephen never married (as far as I can tell). The family name was Neck, but each boy was given the last forename of Van and this was used as part of the surname as they grew up. An interesting way of increasing the social cachet of the family. I wonder if the cousins the Lee Steeres did the same thing. Mike Thanks for that Mike....I'd assumed C Van Neck must be a cousin ( that I couldnt find) rather than a brother called Clare!! Very colourful lives at the top of the social hierarchy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perth Digger Posted 26 November , 2019 Author Share Posted 26 November , 2019 Yes SB, and the American provincial press took great advantage of it whenever an American and the British aristocracy were involved. The lady published her memoirs in 1975, complaining that the lawyers had taken all the best bits out of it. Plus ça change. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now