Ralph J. Whitehead Posted 24 October , 2019 Share Posted 24 October , 2019 I am more familiar with German records so I am a bit confused when reading the Red Cross POW records of captured German troops. In some cases the cause of a wound is mentioned. These show terms such as Gunshot wound, bullet wound and hand grenade wound, all of which are self explanatory. However, many simply say 'Grenade'. In the German records a Granate is an artillery shell and a Handgranate is a hand grenade. Does the term Grenade as used in the Red Cross records indicate an artillery shell? Can anyone provide some guidance on this? Thanks. Ralph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin kenf48 Posted 25 October , 2019 Admin Share Posted 25 October , 2019 I don’t know about the Red Cross but British records used the abbreviation ‘GSW’ to describe any all penetrating wounds. They did not differentiate as to the weapon which caused the wound. From your description it appears the Red Cross Records fell between the two camps going for the specific as well as the generic. Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph J. Whitehead Posted 26 October , 2019 Author Share Posted 26 October , 2019 I did a little more research and comparison to known loss descriptions of men found on these lists. I can only assume that the word 'grenade' by itself does indicate an artillery shell as it would in German, 'Granate' as opposed to Handgranaten, or hand grenade. Further entries do support this finding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now