EL KAISER Posted 5 July , 2019 Share Posted 5 July , 2019 I found the following source (https://d2ct263enury6r.cloudfront.net/wjtUw0Rs5B6PbUu3zggvIi2gVfuqF3xqukTWXXf77X1ti1al.pdf) detailing that Austria-Hungary supposedly produced more coal and steel (in 1913/14) than Russia and even France: Coal/steel output (in million tonnes) 36.2/3.6 (Russia) 40/4.6 (France) 47/5 (A-H) I thought both Russia and France had much more powerful economies, yet those materials are very basic to any industrialized nation. Are the figures correct? Do others here know other sources? Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMeech Posted 5 July , 2019 Share Posted 5 July , 2019 37 minutes ago, EL KAISER said: I found the following source (https://d2ct263enury6r.cloudfront.net/wjtUw0Rs5B6PbUu3zggvIi2gVfuqF3xqukTWXXf77X1ti1al.pdf) detailing that Austria-Hungary supposedly produced more coal and steel (in 1913/14) than Russia and even France: Coal/steel output (in million tonnes) 36.2/3.6 (Russia) 40/4.6 (France) 47/5 (A-H) I thought both Russia and France had much more powerful economies, yet those materials are very basic to any industrialized nation. Are the figures correct? Do others here know other sources? Thank you. Hi In 'The World War 1 Databook' by Ellis & Cox, p.285, it has the following: Production of Coal (millions of metric tons): 1913 - France 40.8, Russia 29.0, A-H 43.8. 1914 - France 27.5, Russia 31.9, A-H 39.2. Crude Steel (millions of metric tons): 1913 - France 4.7, Russia 4.2, A-H 2.6. 1914 - France 2.8, Russia - 4.5, A-H 2.2. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durhamdave Posted 9 July , 2019 Share Posted 9 July , 2019 the total coal production of nations is very misleading as there is a vast difference in calorific value between coals and lignites some coals are much more useful in a war economy partiularly in steel makingl. coking coals are needed for metal forgings. Navy boilers at the time prefered hard coals,so it was the quality of coals that counted . reguards dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EL KAISER Posted 21 September , 2019 Author Share Posted 21 September , 2019 And since we are on the subject, why did Russia had a much bigger industry than Austria's? From what i have read, Austria-Hungary outproduced russia in coal production, in industrial machinery production, in electric home appliances, in the density of its railway network, in the percentage of the urban population, etc. I mean it seems it was much more modernized and industrialized than russia, yet russia supposedly had a much bigger industry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now