Steven Broomfield Posted 21 February , 2020 Share Posted 21 February , 2020 Perceptive woman, Mrs H. Spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squirrel Posted 22 February , 2020 Share Posted 22 February , 2020 11 hours ago, Steven Broomfield said: Perceptive woman, Mrs H. Spot on. Absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardenerbill Posted 22 February , 2020 Share Posted 22 February , 2020 I went to see it this afternoon, and would largely agree with Mark and Mrs H. I too thought the opening was particularly good moving through the trenches and then out into no man's land but I found myself wondering how they new which direction to go in across a desolate featureless landscape, it was quite a way into the film before one of the men got out a compass. It was interesting to see the staff car and trucks and the abandoned German trenches and dugouts were well done. All in all worth a look for the period detail and the cinematography but it could have been so much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Maria Posted 28 February , 2020 Share Posted 28 February , 2020 On 06/02/2020 at 20:47, Steven Broomfield said: A truly excellent book. Interestingly, however, I don't recall the officers in the book using the F word. Just finished reading 'The Middle Parts of Fortune' and Captain Malet uses the F word once when berating the Adjutant over the overuse of his men on fatigues . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 22 hours ago, Black Maria said: Just finished reading 'The Middle Parts of Fortune' and Captain Malet uses the F word once when berating the Adjutant over the overuse of his men on fatigues . But not to the men: to a fellow officer. My quibble was that the movie had officers effing and blinding at the men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardenerbill Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 I have a question, When Schofield escapes from Écoust-Saint-Mein he jumps in a river which becomes a raging torrent of rapids flowing through a rocky gorge, this seemed odd to me in a largely flat agricultural part of France, do such rapids exist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Hone Posted 29 February , 2020 Author Share Posted 29 February , 2020 (edited) The mysterious mountain torrent has been queried by other commentators. I could only conclude that, having had his hand cut by barbed wire, been blown up, buried alive, temporarily blinded, shot and rendered unconscious for several hours, he must have been hallucinating by this stage of proceedings. Edited 29 February , 2020 by Mark Hone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardenerbill Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 There's also the bit at the end when the officer tells him to go and get his wounds attended to, which of course prompts you to look and lo and behold his wounds have disappeared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonraker Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 3 minutes ago, Gardenerbill said: There's also the bit at the end when the officer tells him to go and get his wounds attended to, which of course prompts you to look and lo and behold his wounds have disappeared. SPOILER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gardenerbill Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 2 minutes ago, Moonraker said: SPOILER! Ooh sorry, have you not seen it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trajan Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 My Dutch mate, ex-army, saw it in the Netherlands. On the whole he liked it - BUT, he knows the landscape, and the river scene was what he picked up on... It doesn't look as if it will be released here, and so although I am in two minds about it, on the whole I don't think I will watch it. Yes, just a film - but sorry, impossible geography? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Maria Posted 29 February , 2020 Share Posted 29 February , 2020 5 hours ago, Steven Broomfield said: But not to the men: to a fellow officer. My quibble was that the movie had officers effing and blinding at the men. Oh yes i agree , i think in the book he only used that language to the adjutant in the presence of the men because he was at the end of his tether . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil andrade Posted 1 March , 2020 Share Posted 1 March , 2020 (edited) 23 hours ago, Steven Broomfield said: But not to the men: to a fellow officer. My quibble was that the movie had officers effing and blinding at the men. Had there been a kind of “ dumbing down” of the officers’ deportment by this phase of the war, as a result of promotion from the ranks? Or would the status of “ temporary gentlemen” have imparted a great anxiety about retaining distinction in speech and conduct ? So much of the film was characterised by concessions to present day sensibilities : something that can be profoundly irritating ....but it’s all too understandable if the box office performance is taken into account. Phil Edited 1 March , 2020 by phil andrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigelcave Posted 1 March , 2020 Share Posted 1 March , 2020 Hmmm. The river/dam etc was an obvious imaginative addition - the nearest 'river' I think is the Cojeul, hardly a river, more like an oversized stream. What really hit me was the metropolis of Ecoust (as depicted), in 1914 a modest place of maybe 650 souls. The nearest canal was several kilometres to the east of the village (i.e. well behind, e.g., the Queant Switch). However, this is to try and impose too much on what is a drama based on two characters in a Great War 'situation'. I would still recommend people to see it, there is much in it that is very well done. Just suspend the detail of your wartime knowledge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Maria Posted 2 March , 2020 Share Posted 2 March , 2020 On the subject of officers swearing at other ranks , in the current memoir i'm reading the private soldier was part of a squad being drilled by an officer who was becoming exasperated at their efforts . " Finding further urging useless he halted us . Not satisfied with injury , he added insult by using an extremely vulgar phrase , unbecoming of a man holding his rank as a British officer . Some of the squad were inclined to report him , but fearing red-tape influence would get the better of them the matter was allowed to pass " . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil andrade Posted 2 March , 2020 Share Posted 2 March , 2020 Black Maria, What was the date of this anecdote ? Seeing that you’re interested in the BEF in 1914, I’m wondering whether this suggests that the old regular officers of the earlier time of the war were held to a stricter protocol than their more socially diverse successors. Phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squirrel Posted 2 March , 2020 Share Posted 2 March , 2020 42 minutes ago, phil andrade said: Black Maria, What was the date of this anecdote ? Was the unit in question Regular, New Army or Territorial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Maria Posted 2 March , 2020 Share Posted 2 March , 2020 37 minutes ago, phil andrade said: Black Maria, What was the date of this anecdote ? Seeing that you’re interested in the BEF in 1914, I’m wondering whether this suggests that the old regular officers of the earlier time of the war were held to a stricter protocol than their more socially diverse successors. Phil This was 1917 , he had been transferred to the Tank Corps from the R.Es but had yet to see overseas service . I know it's difficult to generalize too much but i don't remember reading other accounts of officers swearing at the men , although Captain Burgoyne of the 2nd R.I.R s wasn't adverse to delivering a good old fashioned upper cut to his men when he thought the situation warranted it and he was an old regular officer . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Maria Posted 2 March , 2020 Share Posted 2 March , 2020 15 minutes ago, squirrel said: Was the unit in question Regular, New Army or Territorial? It was the Tank Corps , probably at Bovington Camp in Dorset . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squirrel Posted 3 March , 2020 Share Posted 3 March , 2020 It took all sorts I suppose . Perhaps exasperation set in for the Officer and those being drilled or the individual making the comment had led a sheltered existence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Maria Posted 3 March , 2020 Share Posted 3 March , 2020 1 hour ago, squirrel said: It took all sorts I suppose . Perhaps exasperation set in for the Officer and those being drilled or the individual making the comment had led a sheltered existence. He may well have done , although he did later serve at the front so would have heard some choice language there and the incident still left an impression on him when he wrote his memoirs some five years later . I don't think that the portrayal of the officers in the film came across particularly well , with the senior officer swearing and the junior one drunk and swearing and another in a funk and unable to go over the top. I have read accounts of drunk officers who only showed up in the front line when the danger had passed but these were the exception rather than the rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johntaylor Posted 3 March , 2020 Share Posted 3 March , 2020 (edited) On the subject of swearing, this is from 2nd Lieut (later Captain) Wilfred Bion's account of the Battle of Cambrai in November 1917 (in his book The Long Week-end): Bion was also in the Tank Corps but I wouldn't read too much into that! I can't think this kind of behaviour would have been too unusual in the stress of combat, though Bion's honesty certainly is. All in all I agree with Nigel Cave's comment - for all its cinematic licence, there's an awful lot to recommend about the film. The opening trench scenes in particular seem stunningly realistic, and the individual depictions of officers and men all seemed to ring true in different ways. John . Edited 3 March , 2020 by johntaylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gareth Davies Posted 3 March , 2020 Share Posted 3 March , 2020 2 hours ago, johntaylor said: All in all I agree with Nigel Cave's comment - for all its cinematic licence, there's an awful lot to recommend about the film. The opening trench scenes in particular seem stunningly realistic, and the individual depictions of officers and men all seemed to ring true in different ways. John Hear hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunner Bailey Posted 5 March , 2020 Share Posted 5 March , 2020 On 29/02/2020 at 11:03, Gardenerbill said: I have a question, When Schofield escapes from Écoust-Saint-Mein he jumps in a river which becomes a raging torrent of rapids flowing through a rocky gorge, this seemed odd to me in a largely flat agricultural part of France, do such rapids exist? The nearest waterfall in the battle area I can think of is the one in the park in Albert. Not on the scale of the one in the film but a) it exists b) it's in a town - so may have inspired the writers to think such a scene might be authentic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil andrade Posted 5 March , 2020 Share Posted 5 March , 2020 (edited) Was the Great War generation more “ prissy” than others ? Officers effed and blinded in other eras. At Inkerman, as the hordes of Russians surrounded the British position, the officer in command of the division or brigade turned to his French ally and said, in French, what can only be translated as “we’re f****d ! “ Phil Edited 5 March , 2020 by phil andrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now