KGB Posted 3 August , 2018 Share Posted 3 August , 2018 I caught a glimpse of some news presenter doing a piece on the last 100 days. Began well, then went a bit "feminist contribution to the war" and finally "ethnic minorities". Are we seeing the narrative being rewritten for a P.C age? The Home Front could be mentioned but I note that Whitehall wanted Passchendaele to be more "inclusive", with Nigerian and Somalian communities. Thing is, they played no major role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seaJane Posted 3 August , 2018 Share Posted 3 August , 2018 Is "no major" role a reason to leave them out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liz in Eastbourne Posted 4 August , 2018 Share Posted 4 August , 2018 They had nothing to do with the war on the Western Front as far as I know - the Nigeria Regiment fought in the Cameroons and East Africa but were never in Europe in WW1, again as far as I know. If it's really being suggested they should be included in the story of Passchendaele I'd agree that's daft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sassenach Posted 4 August , 2018 Share Posted 4 August , 2018 What exactly is being referred to here? The Passchendaele commemoration has been and gone, of course. What is the evidence that "Whitehall wanted etc?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGB Posted 4 August , 2018 Author Share Posted 4 August , 2018 23 hours ago, seaJane said: Is "no major" role a reason to leave them out? I take your point, I partly agree. 1914-18 was about the sacrifice in the trenches. If the BBC wish to make a special programme on women's or ethnic war contributions fine. But not to over ride what was the focal point. 3 hours ago, Liz in Eastbourne said: They had nothing to do with the war on the Western Front as far as I know - the Nigeria Regiment fought in the Cameroons and East Africa but were never in Europe in WW1, again as far as I know. If it's really being suggested they should be included in the story of Passchendaele I'd agree that's daft. The Passchendaele angle was far more to do with social engineering and very Orwellian. How do we get some communities to feel included? Rewrite history? 3 hours ago, sassenach said: What exactly is being referred to here? The Passchendaele commemoration has been and gone, of course. What is the evidence that "Whitehall wanted etc?" I saw it on the internet. It must be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liz in Eastbourne Posted 4 August , 2018 Share Posted 4 August , 2018 3 hours ago, KGB said: I take your point, I partly agree. 1914-18 was about the sacrifice in the trenches. If the BBC wish to make a special programme on women's or ethnic war contributions fine. But not to over ride what was the focal point. The Passchendaele angle was far more to do with social engineering and very Orwellian. How do we get some communities to feel included? Rewrite history? I saw it on the internet. It must be true. I find it hard to believe, so do find it again for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now