Sue L Posted 13 June , 2018 Share Posted 13 June , 2018 Hi Would it be fair to say that SOME men who joined the RAMC may have done so because they were conscientious objectors? Or is that just too much of a sweeping generalisation to have any basis in fact? I am not referring to a specific man - this is just a general query Thanks Sue L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry_Reeves Posted 13 June , 2018 Share Posted 13 June , 2018 (edited) Sue Yes, there were some direct enlistments into the RAMC by men who were COs. The late Dr John Rae notes this in his book Conscience and Politics - The British Government and the Conscientious Objector to Military Service 1916-1919. Oxford University Press 1970. The numbers were relatively small though. This site gives some figures which confirm the above: http://tinyurl.com/ybsfo5ez TR Edited 14 June , 2018 by Terry_Reeves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue L Posted 13 June , 2018 Author Share Posted 13 June , 2018 Thank you. I will check this out Sue L Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petestarling Posted 14 June , 2018 Share Posted 14 June , 2018 Terry That is an interesting link. Thank you. It would be interesting to find out if, when fit RAMC men were compulsory transferred to the infantry in 1917 and vice versa, less fit men to the RAMC, if they were left alone because of their beliefs. Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnumbellum Posted 15 June , 2018 Share Posted 15 June , 2018 As the linked article has attempted to demonstrate, when men who had, pre-1916, volunteered for the RAMC precisely because they could not conscientiously enlist in a combat unit, were in 1917/18 compulsorily transferred to infantry regiments, they unsurprisingly refused to obey, leading to court-martial and imprisonment. So far as the Army was concerned, such men had a higher value rotting in prison than continuing medical work. With regard to the suggestion that less fit men may at this time have been drafted iinto the RAMC, I am not aware of any such. Less fit men were more likely to be drafted into the Labour Corps/, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PJS Posted 15 June , 2018 Share Posted 15 June , 2018 (edited) 6 hours ago, Magnumbellum said: With regard to the suggestion that less fit men may at this time have been drafted iinto the RAMC, I am not aware of any such. Less fit men were more likely to be drafted into the Labour Corps/, The link below is not strictly on topic (nothing about conscientious objectors) but I found the first hand account of life in the RAMC very interesting. He speaks to his medical rating (B2) being the factor that got him assigned to the RAMC, the fitness of others in the RAMC and the overnight upgrade to his - and everyone else's - medical rating. http://worldwar1veterans.blogspot.com/2015/03/112171-pte-frank-gearing-royal-army.html The other 2 pages of the interview are here: http://worldwar1veterans.blogspot.com/2015/03/112171-pre-frank-gearing-ramc-part-two.html http://worldwar1veterans.blogspot.com/2015/05/112171-private-frank-gearing-ramc-part.html Peter Edited 15 June , 2018 by PJS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sue L Posted 20 June , 2018 Author Share Posted 20 June , 2018 Thanks Peter I agree - very interesting Sue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now