Steve1871 Posted 16 February , 2018 Share Posted 16 February , 2018 Hey everybody. Been collector and study arms, mostly 1870's through Great War. Mauser M.71. Rifle/carb/ bayo's ect are my core collecting.here on GWF I keep seeing reference to M.71 Cadet.Outside of Forum, never heard of a cadet?? Can someone please help?! Thank you all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1871 Posted 16 February , 2018 Author Share Posted 16 February , 2018 A friend just sent me pic's of a bayo that looks just slightly smaller than a standard S.71. Has no date or acceptance marks yet crossguard is unit marked? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4thGordons Posted 17 February , 2018 Share Posted 17 February , 2018 Is this cadet reference to a smaller scale M71 RIFLE or just a smaller bayonet? Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1871 Posted 17 February , 2018 Author Share Posted 17 February , 2018 A standard M71 rifle, the S.61 bayos also fit the Comm. 88 Sorry, my typing bad. Looking about a "Cadet " bayonet that think can fit the M.71 mauser and the comm.88 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave66 Posted 17 February , 2018 Share Posted 17 February , 2018 Do you mean a standard bayonet that has had the blade reduced in size....I only collect British, but have seen Victorian examples shortened for cadet use. Dave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trajan Posted 17 February , 2018 Share Posted 17 February , 2018 I have problems typing also and often make mistakes owing to dreaded dyslexia, but a bayo and a bayonet are different things my friened! The first is an 'orrid American expression, the second, well, a sharp pointed thing that belongs on the end of a rifle Also, the S. in S.71 is for Seitengewehr or sidearm, so S.71 means it is a type 71 bayonet. Are there cadet versions of the S.71? Yes. See the discussion at: http://1914-1918.invisionzone.com/forums/topic/160916-german-m1871-bayonet/?page=2 especially the discussion at post 36. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now