Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Recommended Posts

Apologies in advance for  my lack of knowledge. I'm researching Richard John Jones, Private 1931, 6 Battalion, Royal Welsh Fusiliers. His medal card shows '2c Balkans'. I'm aware of 2a and 2b but not 2c. Is this an error or could it mean Suvla Bay, C beach?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Colgot said:

Apologies in advance for  my lack of knowledge. I'm researching Richard John Jones, Private 1931, 6 Battalion, Royal Welsh Fusiliers. His medal card shows '2c Balkans'. I'm aware of 2a and 2b but not 2c. Is this an error or could it mean Suvla Bay, C beach?  

 

Hi Colgot,

Welcome to the forum, I have had a look at the medal index card and I believe it is 2b, if you look at the "b" in Labour Corps written in the same hand it looks the same. As you are aware "b" is Galipoli and this fits with the 1/6th RWF who were at Galipoli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Colgot said:

 His medal card shows '2c Balkans'. I'm aware of 2a and 2b but not 2c.

Colgot

 

As Mark has already suggested the Medal Index Card shows 2b and not 2c, there wasn’t a theatre code 2c for the 1915/1915 Star.  This is borne out on the actual medal roll which clearly states 2b with an entry date of 11.8.15.

 

Regards

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Colgot said:

Thanks gents....I'm learning quickly!

 

Colin

 

If you like, I can give you an idea when he joined the Labour Corps based on his number, they were allocated in blocks and I have a book at home with a reference table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gardenerbill said:

 

If you like, I can give you an idea when he joined the Labour Corps based on his number, they were allocated in blocks and I have a book at home with a reference table.

 

Pte 193982

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin,

Labour Coprs number 193982 was allocated june to September 1917. This information comes from the book 'No Labour, No Battle - Military Labour During the First World War' John Starling and Ivor Lee. There are several possible reasons why Pte Richard Jones was transferred to the Labours Corps, usually it was because a man was no longer fit for front line duty, this could be due to a wound, an injury or the effects of an illness. The numbers tended to be allocated in blocks so again looking at service records for near numbers, may give a clue to which unit he served in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm reasonably competent with general family history research but moving into military records is something new! Fortunately I was able to obtain both his service and medical discharge records through FMP. Unfortunately that only raises more questions!

 

His age at enlistment and discharge seems random. His real age would have been 35 in 1914 but he is recorded as 39, then on discharge, four years later, as 46. Did they just pick a number?

 

His home, Penygroes, held the drill hall for C company, 6 Bat., RWF. At his age was it likely that he was already a territorial soldier?  

 

Record shows that (thanks to you) that he was at Gallipoli, then Egypt, then a few weeks in France before back to the UK 16 December 1916. Next entry is transfer to Kings Liverpool Labour Corps. 3 April 1917, then 1st Labour Battalion, 15 June 1917 to Agricultural Company Depot, 30 June 1917 to 419th company. Then awol 26 June 1918 to 8 July 1018, then trfd to 393, then 392 labour companies.

 

His medical discharge papers seem to confuse! He is referred to as G.P.I. but only first observed 3 August 1918 (as recorded...eighteen months after return from foreign service). He receives a medical discharge, with pension. The records up to referral, state that there is no indication of syphilis but the final assessment appears to attribute his condition to syphilis!

 

...'hoping to be corrected and put on the right track,

 

Colin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Colgot said:

I'm reasonably competent with general family history research but moving into military records is something new! Fortunately I was able to obtain both his service and medical discharge records through FMP. Unfortunately that only raises more questions!

 

His age at enlistment and discharge seems random. His real age would have been 35 in 1914 but he is recorded as 39, then on discharge, four years later, as 46. Did they just pick a number?

 

His home, Penygroes, held the drill hall for C company, 6 Bat., RWF. At his age was it likely that he was already a territorial soldier?  

 

Record shows that (thanks to you) that he was at Gallipoli, then Egypt, then a few weeks in France before back to the UK 16 December 1916. Next entry is transfer to Kings Liverpool Labour Corps. 3 April 1917, then 1st Labour Battalion, 15 June 1917 to Agricultural Company Depot, 30 June 1917 to 419th company. Then awol 26 June 1918 to 8 July 1018, then trfd to 393, then 392 labour companies.

 

His medical discharge papers seem to confuse! He is referred to as G.P.I. but only first observed 3 August 1918 (as recorded...eighteen months after return from foreign service). He receives a medical discharge, with pension. The records up to referral, state that there is no indication of syphilis but the final assessment appears to attribute his condition to syphilis!

 

...'hoping to be corrected and put on the right track,

 

Colin

 


#1931 was allocated 22 Sep 1914 and he declared he had no prior service.

Craig

Edited by ss002d6252
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark..it drops into place. That explains how he appeared at Pembroke military hospital then referred to the Welsh Metropolitan, Whitchurch, Nr Cardiff! I'm still confused about his medical discharge reasoning. The referral and discharge appear to contradict! Was he suffering from the advanced stages of syphilis? If so why was his condition recorded as 'temporary'. Why does the record show that his condition was aggravated by active service (I think).

 

Also looking at his service records;  the scanned form of service, with close to illegible pencilled answers, appears to show that he was overseas until 1917! Not December 1916!

 

I'm on a huge learning curve. Thanks for your support but is it best that I raise such questions in more specific areas of the forum?

 

Colin 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Colin,

If you are struggling with wording on his service record probably best to post a an image of the part of the page on the 'Interpreting Documents' sub forum, that's what I tend to do, other eyes on the document often help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...