Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Unknown tanks


AOK4

Recommended Posts

On 06/02/2018 at 15:59, Yeomans said:

Agreed.

 

Many thanks to Jan for the initial post.

I'm very pleased that he was able to provide a photo of the tank which Arthur Spreadborough was driving on 7 June 1917 when he was sadly killed - see my original post : Tank 2024 A59, White Chateau, Hollebeke

 

 

Nick,

For convenience, here's a link to the photo of Arthur in that topic.  There are some further pictures of 2024 A59 Slippery Sam on the next page of the topic too.

 

 

[Edit: the link that was here has mysteriously stopped working.  On trying to repair this, I am now getting a message saying the Forum software cannot embed the link due to an 'undefined error'

 

If/when I get to the bottom of this, I'll endeavour to update the link here]

 

 

Jan has already connected that topic back to this one.

[Edit: Jan's corresponding link in that topic has also stopped working]

 

Mark

 

Edited by MBrockway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark

So if this image shows 2689 in the background is that 2669 A10 in the foreground?

Source : Flickr.com/photos/82596826@N03/24239745212

Tanks 2689 and .jpg

Edited by Yeomans
source reference missing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The number 2669 is that of a Mark IV Female.  This is a Mark IV Male.

 

Not sure where 2669 comes from but I may have lost track of something someone's said.

 

Gwyn 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gwyn.

 

Three of "A" Battalion's tanks were lost on 7 June 1917 in the vicinity of Joye Farm / Van Hove Farm. These were 2669, 2689 and 2029. If 2689 is in the background of the image I posted, then the tank in the foreground must be 2029 if we are able to discount it being 2669 by virtue of the fact that the image clearly shows it is a Male Mk IV and you have a note of 2669 being a Female. Does that make sense?

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be tardy in my response. I've only just seen this post.

 

Yes, it does.  In fact all tanks numbered 26xx are Females and all numbered 20xx are Males, so I tend to agree, the tank in the foreground must be 2029.  (I am of course assuming that no tanks were lost at this location on another date.)

 

Gwyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Gwyn.

My friend Baz Crook in Aus, has suggested THE BEHEMOTH ENTERS for 2689.

 

I have "BEHEMOTH" as tank 2665 of "B" Battalion

 

Nick

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you (and Baz). Certainly Behemoth was used as a name for another Mark IV. The name would certainly be appropriate, but was the phrase "The Behemoth Enters" a quote from something?  I've had a quick search but have been unable to turn up anything.

 

Gwyn

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 31/01/2018 at 12:50, AOK4 said:

Slippery

 

From reading Band of Brigands (first men in tanks) by Christy Campbell.

Slippery SAM was an obscure card game or game of some kind.

 

just thought I would throw that in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See Post #26 above.

 

This is an attempt to repair the link back to the other topic that has stopped working in Post #26.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...