johntanner Posted 21 January , 2018 Share Posted 21 January , 2018 See here https://www.lancashire.police.uk/news/2018/january/appeal-to-reunite-medals-with-their-owners/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialSignIn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Upton Posted 21 January , 2018 Share Posted 21 January , 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, johntanner said: See here https://www.lancashire.police.uk/news/2018/january/appeal-to-reunite-medals-with-their-owners/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialSignIn "Both medals, from World War 1, are engraved with Pte H.L Norman MGC/15590." "PC Helen Stanley of Lancaster Police, said: “We believe the medals belong to Private Henry Lionel Norman who died in active service on 28th October 1914. All World War 1 medals were issued automatically after the war either to the service person or to their legal next of kin. We therefore believe that these medals could have been lost by one of Pte Norman’s descendants or it’s possible they could have been sold and later stolen." NOT: https://www.cwgc.org/find-war-dead/casualty/919062/norman,-henry-lionel/ Name: Private L/10559 NORMAN, HENRY LIONEL Regiment: 2nd Bn. The Queen's (Royal West Surrey Regiment) Died: Wednesday, October 28, 1914, on YPRES (MENIN GATE) MEMORIAL http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/D4403026 Reference: WO 372/15/3899 Description: Medal card of Norman, Henry L Corps Regiment No Rank The Queen's Regiment L/10559 Private BUT: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/D4403028 Reference: WO 372/15/3901 Description: Medal card of Norman, Henry L Corps Regiment No Rank Machine Gun Corps 15590 Private East Kent Regiment 8453 Private Edited 22 January , 2018 by Andrew Upton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Upton Posted 22 January , 2018 Share Posted 22 January , 2018 I've just sent a message to the Lancashire Police non-emergency bit of their website pointing out the correction, which hopefully might help in tracking down the rightful owner. I can see why they picked the wrong man though - two fairly unusually and identically (or nearly so) named men, both who had a service number (in different regiments) that comprised the same 5 numbers in a very slightly different order to each other. What are the odds on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now