CooperS Posted 9 November , 2016 Share Posted 9 November , 2016 I picked this marker up from outside the fence at Trois Arbres Cemetery several years ago. Unfortunately I have been unable to discover who the unfortunate soldier was. The CWGC have been unable to assist and a look at all Australian soldiers with the sern of 1760 hasn't solved the mystery either. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tootrock Posted 9 November , 2016 Share Posted 9 November , 2016 Perhaps this marker was made in error. There is a soldier, A. Darby with the number 1760 buried in this cemetery. 1st/5th Btn Northumberland Fusiliers There are two soldiers with the initials W,J, and surname beginning with "H". 420 Private William Jamieson Hume, 40 Btn, AIF 64 Sergeant William John Hutton, 52 Btn AIF There are no soldiers with the three forename initials W.J.H. Were these markers made on site at the time of burial? Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Strawbridge Posted 9 November , 2016 Share Posted 9 November , 2016 Here is an outside possibility but please take with a huge pinch of salt as it is assumptive. The name tag relates to 1760 Private William J. Haines, Hampshire Regiment. He was believed to have been kia but in fact had been badly wounded. He was shipped home and died of his wounds. The CWGC commemorate him as 305484 Private W.J. Haines, 1st/7th Hampshire Regiment who died 28th February 1919 and is buried in Lymington, Hants. The MIC shows that both service numbers relate to the same man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEW Posted 9 November , 2016 Share Posted 9 November , 2016 1760 A. Darby did not seem to have a known number when the GRRFs were typed up or annotated later, circa Dec 1920. So his number has been determined 1921 onwards. It's possible that a body believed to be 1760 Private William J. Haines was buried there and then the error discovered later but while there are plenty of corrections to the GRRFs eg UBS being named, named becoming UBS, named marked as still alive. Nothing there for Haines or number 1760. TEW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Mackenzie Posted 9 November , 2016 Share Posted 9 November , 2016 I wondered if it was something to do with 1760 Pte Isaac Hopper Whittiker of 1/4 Northumberland Fusiliers who, whilst in a a different Bn to Darby, did die around the same time and was in the same Division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperS Posted 12 November , 2016 Author Share Posted 12 November , 2016 Thanks for the suggestions guys. William Haines looks a distinct possibility, but I suppose it will remain a tantalising mystery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now