Northern Soul Posted 4 December , 2004 Share Posted 4 December , 2004 This man seems to have a rather long service number for an infantryman; Name: BREAKWELL, ELI Initials: E Nationality: United Kingdom Rank: Private Regiment: King's Own (Royal Lancaster Regt.) Unit Text: 1st Bn. Age: 32 Date of Death: 23/06/1921 Service No: 3701821 Additional information: Son of John and Mary Breakwell; husband of Edith Maud Breakwell, of 3 Spring Gardens, Ulverston. Born at Barrow-in-Furness. Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead Grave/Memorial Reference: B. NC. 66. Cemetery: ULVERSTON CEMETERY According to his Medal Index Card it was 13532, so is this a error in the CWGC database or is it correct? Andy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Denham Posted 4 December , 2004 Share Posted 4 December , 2004 The above long number is as printed in the original 1930 CWGC register. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeppoSapone Posted 4 December , 2004 Share Posted 4 December , 2004 This man seems to have a rather long service number for an infantryman; Name: BREAKWELL, ELI Initials: E Nationality: United Kingdom Rank: Private Regiment: King's Own (Royal Lancaster Regt.) Unit Text: 1st Bn. Age: 32 Date of Death: 23/06/1921 Service No: 3701821 Additional information: Son of John and Mary Breakwell; husband of Edith Maud Breakwell, of 3 Spring Gardens, Ulverston. Born at Barrow-in-Furness. Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead Grave/Memorial Reference: B. NC. 66. Cemetery: ULVERSTON CEMETERY According to his Medal Index Card it was 13532, so is this a error in the CWGC database or is it correct? Andy. Looks like a number from the post 1920 "blocks" of 7 digit army numbers, note army number not regimental number. This was a scheme by which soldiers were issued with one number, an ARMY number, and kept the same number no matter how many times they were transferred. Numbers from these "blocks" were still being used in WW2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeppoSapone Posted 9 December , 2004 Share Posted 9 December , 2004 An 8 digit "regimental" number starting with 14 had already been allocated to the Pioneer Corps (14000000) from 1939 , the Lowland Regiment and the Highland Regiment from 1943, and the General Service Corps also in 1943. Along with these , 15 other units were allocated 8 digit numbers between 1939 and 1950. Dave. You could be right on that Dave. However, the 1920 "blocks" were still being used alongside these "afterthought" units with 8 figure numbers. Somewhere I read, and you may know more of this, that the 1920 "blocks" were being issued as long as individual units trained their own soldiers. At the start of WW2 a soldier would join the "Blankshires" and get a number from the "Blankshires" block, and keep it as long as they were in the army. Around the middle of the war new recruits began to be directed into the army, given a General Service number, and then transferred to which ever arm suited their aptitude or, more likely, where soldiers were most needed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now