Matlock1418 Posted 4 June , 2016 Share Posted 4 June , 2016 Found an officer with a couple of London Gazette entries under Royal Artillery but his medal card [apparently his, assuming I've got the same chap - seems likely, but that is not the main point] indicates Bombay Volunteer Artillery. So got me wondering ...??? Were the BVA "British Army" [RA] or "Indian Army"? Was there a difference during WW1? Please excuse my ignorance and/or terminology. Thanks. Matlock1418 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sotonmate Posted 4 June , 2016 Share Posted 4 June , 2016 Kew Library has sets of annuals for both British Army and Indian Army Lists. You could get an answer from these, if you can't get there you could ask for a look-up in that section here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimberley John Lindsay Posted 4 June , 2016 Share Posted 4 June , 2016 Dear Matlock1418, What was his name? This way, knowlegeable GWF wallahs (of which there are many) can get a handle on your interesting request. Off the cuff, I would say he was an Indian Volunteer: but of course, such artillery officers shifted easily into RA batteries, 1418... Kindest regards, Kim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaureenE Posted 4 June , 2016 Share Posted 4 June , 2016 Volunteer Regiments in India were part of the Indian Army structure. For details see the FIBIS Fibiwiki page Auxiliary Regiments http://wiki.fibis.org/index.php/Auxiliary_Regiments However all Artillery, except for Mountain Artillery, (and some miscellaneous associated artillery) was part of the Royal Artillery, and hence British Army As far as I am aware, the Bombay Volunteer Artillery did not fight as a Battery overseas, (out of India) although some individual members did. There are a number of Indian Army Lists online http://wiki.fibis.org/index.php/Indian_Army_List_online and British Army Lists, but not as yet Monthly Lists http://wiki.fibis.org/index.php/Military_periodicals_online Functionally he was Royal Artillery, although nominally he may have been Indian Army. Cheers Maureen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Clifton Posted 6 June , 2016 Share Posted 6 June , 2016 ... However all Artillery, except for Mountain Artillery, (and some miscellaneous associated artillery) was part of the Royal Artillery, and hence British Army ... Functionally he was Royal Artillery, although nominally he may have been Indian Army. Cheers Maureen The Bombay (and other) Volunteer Artillery were not part of the British Army. They were auxiliary forces of the Indian Army. However, many of these units had officers from the Regular Army (British or Indian) attached to them so your man may have been either. Ron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now