trajan Posted 15 May , 2015 Share Posted 15 May , 2015 The full title is: "Poignant stories of first world war's conscientious objectors go online". See: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/15/poignant-stories-of-first-world-wars-conscientious-objectors-go-online Oh, perhaps I should add a 'DS' quote alert... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Filsell Posted 15 May , 2015 Share Posted 15 May , 2015 Thanks for the warning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnumbellum Posted 15 May , 2015 Share Posted 15 May , 2015 I have no idea what Trajan means by "a 'DS' quote alert", or why it should be interpreted as a warning, but, as it happens, caution should be exercised in reading the commentary provided by IWM The caption describing the conscientious objectors at Wakefield as in "prison", obscures the fact that they had been been released from prison to enter the Home Office Scheme, whereby they were placed in what had been Wakefield Prison, but with locks taken off the cell doors, the inmates allowed to wear plain clothes, and free to go outside in the evenings and on Sundays. Conditions were indeed harsh in Wakefield Work Centre, as it became, but it does not help public understanding to confuse the matter, or to give the impression that photographs could easily be taken inside actual prisons in those days, with prisoners wearing plain clothes rather than the 'broad arrow' prison uniform. The same applies to Dartmoor Prison, which became Princetown Work Centre under the Scheme. Moreover, it did not open until March 1917, so no-one could have written in the winter of 1916 about immediately impending transfer to it, The letter could only have been written in spring 1917. Putting CO material online is to be welcomed, particularly on International Conscientious Objectors' Day, but care needs to be taaken to explain rather than confuse. Credit is to be given to Cyril Pearce, but those errors are clearly not of his making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trajan Posted 15 May , 2015 Author Share Posted 15 May , 2015 I have no idea what Trajan means by "a 'DS' quote alert", or why it should be interpreted as a warning, but, as it happens, caution should be exercised in reading the commentary provided by IWM ... Thank you for clarifying things - and a clarification in return is that 'D.S.' are the initials of a not always entirely accurate but oft-quoted commentator on GW and other military matters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kath Posted 15 May , 2015 Share Posted 15 May , 2015 Has our "Temptage" made a contribution to the IWM site? Kath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now