Jump to content
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

International Peace Bureau exhibition. Ramparts, Ypres.


chrislock

Recommended Posts

Before you decide to amble along the ramparts in respectful contemplation, please see the thread applicable to the "The International Peace Bureau exhibition which comes with full town hall support which has been erected within the vicinity of the Menin Gate Memorial enclosure & nearby new memorial on behalf of Gurkha sacrifice. Many extreme images with text are included within the exhibition. Some are applicable to the Northern Ireland and Palestinian/Israeli conflicts.

Please be patient and Frajohn will upload some images asap and then I welcome you to make your own minds up........

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Images to follow and over to you guys. I welcome your thoughts on this development................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before you decide to amble along the ramparts in respectful contemplation, please see the thread applicable to the "The International Peace Bureau exhibition which comes with full town hall support which has been erected within the vicinity of the Menin Gate Memorial enclosure & nearby new memorial on behalf of Gurkha sacrifice. Many extreme images with text are included within the exhibition. Some are applicable to the Northern Ireland and Palestinian/Israeli conflicts.

Please be patient and Frajohn will upload some images asap and then I welcome you to make your own minds up........

Chris

Perhaps continuing with one's own respectful contemplation is the best and most dignified response to the "International Peace Bureau - but I have also communicated with the CWGC in the UK and Ypres to ask for their take on this so close to the Gate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed Ian and I agree with your comments. I have also received a notification from CWGC Head Office at Maidenhead informing me that they are looking into this development and will come back to me in due course as are other offices from vested persons or departments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed Ian and I agree with your comments. I have also received a notification from CWGC Head Office at Maidenhead informing me that they are looking into this development and will come back to me in due course as are other offices from vested persons or departments.

It's good that the CWGC know that these developments are noticed and that people care.

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised that such a potent symbol as the Menin Gate exercises a seemingly irresistible temptation in the minds of some to enlist it to support their causes. Good taste and decorum doesn't seem to come into their considerations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ianw,

I do have some sympathy with the 'Fair enough, but display it elsewhere' argument but it seems to me that the only cause in which the 'popularity' of the Menin Gate is being used here is that of those people against war, oppression and violence. Hands up anyone in favour of those things? The examples chrislock has highlighted are emotive for some people, but that is how a point is made. I am a serving officer who dislikes the Army and its soldiers being unfairly disparaged, but I cannot find the Londonderry mural objectionable.

I would not discount simple ignorance here rather than a political purpose on the council's part. If the text had read 'British soldiers mercilessly and without reason slaughtered thousands of etc., etc.,' then that would be unfair. But it doesn't. There's just a picture of a common scene.

For me, the proximity of the display to the Menin Gate is intended to invite people to apply their thoughts on the Gate and the events of a century ago to the conflicts that are still ongoing. Some of us may believe history is worth studying for its own sake, others may believe the purpose of study is to inform present-day thinking. It seems the town council thinks the latter. Fair enough.

- brummell

Edited by SPOF
Removed a sentence which is not really applicable to the thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brummell - each to his own of course.

Yes, the Menin Gate and the names upon it are indeed thought provoking but the tens of thousands of men whose names are inscribed upon it would have encompassed all shades of political opinion . I find it grossly offensive that they should be dragooned into mutely supporting a particular political viewpoint albeit one draped in the handily criticism repellent cloak of "Peace".

There have been other such uses in the past both at Tyne Cot and The Menin Gate. In my opinion the CWGC were quite correct in issuing guidelines about the use of these memorials for such purposes. These concentrated on prescribing the use of the interior space of the cemeteries and memorials. It may well be that the current signage obeys the letter of these guidelines , I don't know. However, even if this is the case, the signs appear to me not to be in good taste given their proximity - they definitely seem to be "getting in the face" of the Menin Gate to me. No doubt the intention of them , of course.

I would imagine that the signs are a response to the large centenary crowds at the Menin Gate who no doubt need educating in the opinion of some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am puzzled as to why an item concerning the (British) Tank Memorial, Ypres Salient, is headed "International Peace Bureau". The IPB is an honourable international organisation established in Rome on 27 August 1892, at the conclusion of the 4th Universal Peace Congress, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1910. It has no connection with tanks, British or otherwise, or with the Ypres Salient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have jumped too soon, MB ... the Tank Memorial link is part of Chris's 'signature' and unconnected with the subject of this thread, which is awaiting the posting of images by another member ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

Chris Lock has asked that I post these images on his behalf. There are two others but I have not been unable to download those as yet, will try later.

17285837952_63d8c774ff_b.jpg


17080217977_e5439953c0_b.jpg

16667420893_a71b408fef_b.jpg

17100092190_f03b3b53a3_b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for posting these images Frajohn and gratitude to Siege Gunner for pointing out to Magnumbellum that he needs to work on his reading skills! ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my eye. Can't wait to visit ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously designed to get a message across to people travelling towards the Menin Gate and the positioning of the signage firmly puts the Gate in as the focus/final destination.

Personally i find this distasteful - many will not - but I find it unlikely that there is anything that can be done about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

International Peace Bureau, founded in 1892..... perhaps they need to look at some review of the effectiveness of their strategies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just received a response from CWGC Ypres confirming that the City of Ypres is entitled to position the signage as they have done and that no CWGC rules and guidelines have been infringed. The City of Ypres has agreed to put no signage in the memorial garden without CWGC permission and have not done so.

So that appears to be that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

International Peace Bureau, founded in 1892..... perhaps they need to look at some review of the effectiveness of their strategies.

They are based in Switzerland - a country at peace ever since the IPB was formed... so a roaring success I would say!

:thumbsup:

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know how long these signs are going to be there, please?

It's not something that I like, either, but given the response from the CWGC supplied by ianw above, there's nothing that I / we / anyone can do about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i must say, from an aesthetic point of view, those signs are really ugly. It's just a lot of clutter and makes the path just look dreary. Why don't they put the signs up in war zones instead? Y'know where there's a war…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connor - I agree. They are ugly, and boringly designed. One would have to stand on the grass to read them, although I'm sure the grass will survive the encounter. I don't expect heavy footfall...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...