Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

enfield breech cover?


brummie76

Recommended Posts

i am looking for a pic of a ww1 Enfield breach cover.....can anyone help please?

Thanks

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ere.

How about this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try again

post-49107-0-30265100-1366488791_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or.

And this is one of my favourite WW1 Photo's. At Albert i think.

post-49107-0-41046900-1366489388_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just Google "Lee Enfield breech cover" and click on images. There are plenty, this one is a sample.

Regards

TonyE

post-8515-0-25957100-1366489538_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Onthe above pic, note the 303 round in the sling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys! I was not sure of the colour and if it is ww2 or ww1....is there any difference? When i googled it only ww2 pics appeared despite entering ww1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could well be proved wrong, but I've always understood the WW1 versions were in the khaki brown coloured material, which is similar to the material used for the groundsheets and later the capes of that period. Both of these become a distinct khaki green by WW2 as does the breech cover.

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Onthe above pic, note the 303 round in the sling...

I was always of the understanding that the 303 round in/on the sling was to ensure that it was tight 'didn't slip' whilst carrying your rifle slung over the shoulder, it was also an 'emergency round' if required in the heat of battle apparently

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to own about 4,000 breach covers - all WW2 dated. They were from numerous British & Australian manufacturers. The colours were a very pale green, a mid-green with raw-white canvas lining, dark green and a wide range of khaki from light to a mid-brown. I bought them from a Government auction in 1977, disposing of Royal Navy reserve stores held in Sydney, Aust for about $100 (about GBP40) at the time. The gear was all WW1 & WW2. The rest was all bought by the disposal store cartel. Much of it never appeared on the Australian market, I have often wondered what happened to it all. Anyway the point is that there is a huge range of variation in WW2 manufactured breach covers for the .303 . Just because a cover is khaki does not make it a WW1 cover. Regards Ross T. PS I see WW1 dated examples turn up regularly on ebay - be careful, it can be easy to fake the dates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS I see WW1 dated examples turn up regularly on ebay - be careful, it can be easy to fake the dates.

Indeed - especially if they purport to be by ME Co and are stamped in thick, square sanserif lettering; ditto 37 pattern large packs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never had one that actually fits correctly, they are usually too tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed - especially if they purport to be by ME Co and are stamped in thick, square sanserif lettering; ditto 37 pattern large packs.

Ah yes: the 'Art Deco' stamping style.

Joe had some detail on the pattern a while back - I'll try to find it.

I have one to a casualty in the, IIRC, Essex Cyclists and will try to dig that out. It's certainly not anything like cape material as referenced above; and is really quite flimsy compared to the later ones with the dodgy stamps.

Cheers,

GT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe had some detail on the pattern a while back - I'll try to find it.

http://1914-1918.invisionzone.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19230

"The Breech cover is fully described in LoC 17368, 24 June 1915.

"the Cover is made of Double texture waterproof drill, and is fitted with 3 press studs on the left side of the rifle. Two eyelets are fitted in the cover for a lace which is knotted on the inside to retain it in position:

The cover is attached to rifle by means of the lace as follows-

Rifles Short MLE-- To the guard sling swivel, or through the swivel screw hole in the lugs on the trigger guard."

There are also instructions on how to fit it to the Ross and long LE.

LoC 18301 23 Nov 1916, slightly changed the covers nomenclature to:

Cover Breech, No. 2 MK I---for P14 rifle

Cover, Breech No.1 Mk I--All other patterns

Description is nearly identical except the No' 2 is stamped with a figure 2 on the outside of the pleat. No'1had a figure 1.

Joe Sweeney"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was allways led to be believe, that to distinguish an undated WW1 from a WW2 were the presstuds: with a 'pattern' for WW1, smooth WW2 (although WW1 can also be smooth), is this correct? The only visible marking on my exemple below is a rather large Gov.Arrow...

cov110.jpg

cov210.jpg

cov310.jpg

cov410.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eparges, your example is undoubtedly WW1 as it has the 1910 patent date on the press-studs. I have one identical, with the same leather bootlace. I can't find any markings at all on it. Rgds, W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding not fitting correctly - disagree, they do fit but are very tight.

They usually shrink a little in storage and with handling do stretch back to the correct size. However if they are at all rotten, they tear or the press studs pull out. So be warned.

Regards

Ross T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I say I have never had one that fits correctly, WW1 or WW2 types, and the shrinkage issue needs to be thought about if you want one to use, especially if laying down real money for a genuine WW1 example, so either try before you buy or have pictures sent of it insitu. Another issue I noticed at the weekend were 4 web slings stamped 1916 on the brasses, no maker, all the same stamping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i ask about these covers as i have a replica version and i was wondering if it is ok to use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All,

Here is a 1918 dated cover for the Enfield. Identical to Eparges.

scan0003at.jpg

Note no oval piece and the location of the eyelets --they are much farther back than later WW2 ones.

brummie76--based on the photos you'll have to make the decsision of whether good enough youreslf.

Hope this helps

Joe Sweeney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...