Peter Doyle Posted 18 December , 2011 Share Posted 18 December , 2011 There seems sense in that, FS, though I'm not sure I ever though of it in this way - bearing in mind the mass of recruits that were joining as the war progressed - but as you say, such distinctions would surely become blurred in this period. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FROGSMILE Posted 18 December , 2011 Share Posted 18 December , 2011 There seems sense in that, FS, though I'm not sure I ever though of it in this way - bearing in mind the mass of recruits that were joining as the war progressed - but as you say, such distinctions would surely become blurred in this period. Peter Well Peter, my thinking like that is the product of both, studying photos and my own experiences of 37-years being equipped from QM's stores and, in the latter part, being involved in their supply chain. The principles have changed little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 18 December , 2011 Share Posted 18 December , 2011 Another aspect of Service battalions to note is that they were specifically to be categorised as Regulars, but serving under different Terms of Engagement, usually 3 years or the duration of the war. There was an Army Order to this effect. This [until the rules changed] could produce some strange anomalies, in that a regular of any rank outranked any Special Reserve man of the same rank, who in turn outranked his TF equivalent. Thus a corporal in a newly created S battalion outranked a long-serving corporal of the SR or TF. The rules changed, as they needed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerd.deboeck Posted 18 December , 2011 Author Share Posted 18 December , 2011 Another aspect of Service battalions to note is that they were specifically to be categorised as Regulars, but serving under different Terms of Engagement, usually 3 years or the duration of the war. There was an Army Order to this effect. This [until the rules changed] could produce some strange anomalies, in that a regular of any rank outranked any Special Reserve man of the same rank, who in turn outranked his TF equivalent. Thus a corporal in a newly created S battalion outranked a long-serving corporal of the SR or TF. The rules changed, as they needed to. Did these rules change before the service battalions went in to action or after (Somme 1916?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 18 December , 2011 Share Posted 18 December , 2011 Did these rules change before the service battalions went in to action or after (Somme 1916?). I will try to make time to look it up tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnSchultz Posted 16 February , 2019 Share Posted 16 February , 2019 I know I'm years late, but I've just come across this badge (Bigland's Birkenhead Bantams) on a forum called Petrolheads! The poster wanted help in identifying it. I'm trying to contact him, as I'd like to use the image in a biography I'm writing of my grandfather. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 16 February , 2019 Share Posted 16 February , 2019 That is lovely! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnSchultz Posted 16 February , 2019 Share Posted 16 February , 2019 He might even sell it to me.....! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now