BobbGilly Posted 17 November , 2011 Posted 17 November , 2011 Does anyone know what the Loyal North Lancs 1st Battalion was doing between October 31st and December 12th, 1914? The Battalion Diary covers those members who were fighting, but does not explain what the group who travelled over from Felixtowe via Southampton to Le Harvre on October 31st were doing. They seem to have been in tents somewhere for a few weeks - but I think seeing little or no action, and then elsewhere in better circumstances (officers in a cottage), and only joined the unit on December 12th. Can anyone help? Why were they in Felixtowe?
Chris_Baker Posted 17 November , 2011 Posted 17 November , 2011 They were in Felixstowe because that is where they had completed training with the regiment's 3rd (Reserve) Battalion. It moved there after mobilising at Preston in early August 1914. See http://www.1914-1918.net/loyals.htm
BobbGilly Posted 17 November , 2011 Author Posted 17 November , 2011 Thank you - that's really helpful - but how is it that some of the 1st battalion went over in August - why wouldn't they have gone together?
johndavidswarbrick Posted 17 November , 2011 Posted 17 November , 2011 The war diary for the 1st Battalion North Lancs [August 1914 - January 1918]is available as a download from the National Archives: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documentsonline/details-result.asp?Edoc_Id=8199293&queryType=1&resultcount=5 Click on "add to shopping" and follow the instructions - it will cost you £3.50. Dave Swarbrick
BobbGilly Posted 17 November , 2011 Author Posted 17 November , 2011 Thank you Dave, I have already done that - but it states that H. G. Gilliland - the man I am after - joined them on 4-12-14, but I know from his letters that he shipped over on October 31st from Southampton to La Harvre. Am wondering where he was in the intervening time - and the rest of the men who shipped out with him.
bushfighter Posted 18 November , 2011 Posted 18 November , 2011 Bob Greetings Units do not travel in one party. There is always an Advance Party which moves before the main body. (These days you can also find Pre-Advance Parties and even Pre-Pre-Advance Parties, daft though that sounds.) Advance Parties perform administrative tasks such as taking over stores, equipment and buildings. However they could also include men sent on "familiarisation training" which might include attending specialist courses relevant to the new theatre. (For example today a unit sent into a new environment such as jungle would probably send a number of designated unit instructors on an advance party. These lads - or lasses - would qualify as unit instructors before the main body of the unit arrived.) However in the situation that you are researching there could be an even simpler solution - a General or a Headquarters wanted some men in France for certain tasks, and so 1 LNL was told to provide them. Keep digging - the answer might be totally mundane but will still be interesting. Harry
Chris_Baker Posted 18 November , 2011 Posted 18 November , 2011 I think the answer is mundane. The 31 October party was a reinforcement draft sent from 3rd (Reserve) Bn to replace losses sustained by 1st Bn. All quite normal. Why they did not join it in the field until 12 December is anyone's guess, but that delay would be rather unusual.
BobbGilly Posted 18 November , 2011 Author Posted 18 November , 2011 I thought it was odd too. His letters imply that he spent a couple of weeks sleeping in his valise but in a very muddy area - but seeing no action. Certainly he does not mention it, and writes several times a week - mostly complaints about the stuff he is sent from home. His biggest problem seems to be to do with all the cigarettes sent to his unit from the UK - thousands of them. He then spends some time with other officers in a cottage - during that time one of the huts in which regular soldiers were billeted was hit by shrapnel and some of them were killed - and that seems to have been the closest he came to any action until he joined the unit - which was resting - on December 12. Meanwhile the Battalion Diary is all about the action they are seeing - but H.G.G. and his men are not there. It is odd - this is a newish field for me, but it doesn't seem like the sort of situation where it was normal for whole units to loll around for six weeks?
PaulM44 Posted 14 April , 2012 Posted 14 April , 2012 1321621997[/url]' post='1670541']I thought it was odd too. His letters imply that he spent a couple of weeks sleeping in his valise but in a very muddy area - but seeing no action. Certainly he does not mention it, and writes several times a week - mostly complaints about the stuff he is sent from home. His biggest problem seems to be to do with all the cigarettes sent to his unit from the UK - thousands of them. He then spends some time with other officers in a cottage - during that time one of the huts in which regular soldiers were billeted was hit by shrapnel and some of them were killed - and that seems to have been the closest he came to any action until he joined the unit - which was resting - on December 12. Meanwhile the Battalion Diary is all about the action they are seeing - but H.G.G. and his men are not there. It is odd - this is a newish field for me, but it doesn't seem like the sort of situation where it was normal for whole units to loll around for six weeks? I have researched a soldier who was captured the same day as Gilliland. Gilliland is mentioned and quoted on several occasions. http://www.britishme...=Molloy#p584479 Regards,Paul
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now