Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Medal found metal detecting


stevencarpenter

Recommended Posts

Hi, i recently found a silver Victory medal in a field in Norfolk, England. I was wondering if the owner could be traced? The rim reads - J.7915 6 R.D.COE.BOY 1.R.N

Any help would be most appreciated, thanks, Steve. (there is a possible question mark about the letter R after number as it has been dented at this point)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, i recently found a silver Victory medal in a field in Norfolk, England. I was wondering if the owner could be traced? The rim reads - J.7915 6 R.D.COE.BOY 1.R.N

Any help would be most appreciated, thanks, Steve. (there is a possible question mark about the letter R after number as it has been dented at this point)

Could it be an N as in Naval Division?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Ancestry.com

Richard G Coe , J.79156 Boy.1. Victory and British war medal. Issued aboard HMS Dunedin.

That is very close thankyou, but the scond letter is definately a D?

It stands for Boy 1st Class.

TR

Hi, what does this mean, please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There you are Darknight, within an hour of you joining us you have an answer. Welcome to the power of the GWF! Become interested and you may never leave again. :P

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Boy 1st Class - A boy aged 16 to 18 under training who had served for between 9 months and 18 months rated as Boy 2nd Class, shown sufficient proficiency in seamanship and accumulated at least one Good Conduct Badge (the requirements varied between training ships). His rate of pay was increased on being promoted."

TR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There you are Darknight, within an hour of you joining us you have an answer. Welcome to the power of the GWF! Become interested and you may never leave again. :P

Jim

Thankyou, it is a fast forum indeed, thankyou :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry too much about the D. The number identifies him precisely and means he had a rank of Boy Seaman 1st Class, a boy aged 16 to 18 under training. He will have previously served for between 9 months and 18 months rated as Boy 2nd Class. There are more knowledgeable Pals than me on naval topics who will add to this I am sure.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is very close thank you, but the second letter is definitely a D?

That's close enough for government work. That's you man, or should I say boy.

Now you have to go find the second missing medal. Mind you he was young enough to have served in WWII also, so there may be more medals out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, i recently found a silver Victory medal in a field in Norfolk, England. I was wondering if the owner could be traced? The rim reads - J.7915 6 R.D.COE.BOY 1.R.N

Any help would be most appreciated, thanks, Steve. (there is a possible question mark about the letter R after number as it has been dented at this point)

Hi Darknight,

If your medal is 'silver' then it is infact the British War Medal and not the Victory Medal, which is made from brass and then gilded.

Just thought that you may be interested. Can you post a picture--just to confirm this?

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Darknight,

If your medal is 'silver' then it is infact the British War Medal and not the Victory Medal, which is made from brass and then gilded.

Just thought that you may be interested. Can you post a picture--just to confirm this?

Robert

Having trouble working out how to post pic on here as cant link to photobucket, which is what i normaly do, as pic to big and has to be resized. You are correct though it is not a Victory medal, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Now you have to go find the second missing medal. Mind you he was young enough to have served in WWII also, so there may be more medals out there.

There is a death recorded in the second quarter of 1938 Richard George Coe age 36 yrs Blofield Norfolk (12miles from Martham) so maybe didn't make it to 1939

(there was a marriage in 1936 in Billericay which is a bit more problematic)

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...the Victory Medal, which is made from brass and then gilded...

Small correction, the VM is gilt bronze, not gilt brass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Victory medal is actually not gilt either, merely laquered which tones gold with age over the base medal which is a bronze alloy called tombac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Victory medal is actually not gilt either, merely laquered which tones gold with age over the base medal which is a bronze alloy called tombac.

Hi Scott,

You have raised an interesting question here and in actual fact Tombac is a 'brass' rather than a 'bronze' alloy. The definition of Brass is: "an alloy of copper and zinc", whereas Bronze is an alloy of copper and tin--two totally different animals!!

Brass is a cheaper alloy than bronze and thus Tombac is a Brass rather than a Bronze. The definition of Tombac is: "Any one of several alloys of copper and zinc, used in making inexpensive jewellery" As you will be aware the more zinc included in the alloy the lighter the colour of the alloy and of course this makes it cheaper. Tombac is used in the making of cheap jewellery because the it can be made to look very similar in colour to gold.

In the case of a WW1 Victory Medal the name 'bronze' is a total misnomer used as a generic term rather than a definitive description. The same may apply to the term 'gilt' in this instance, but I have little knowledge of laquers so I shall bow to your greater experience in this field.

Interesting stuff and something I was involved with for circa 30 years.

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Whilst not doubting what you say, Robert, the IWM does say that it`s bronze!

Likewise I won't doubt your expertise (and acknowledging we're swerving off-thread, but I'm finding this fascinating) but that well known racehorse owner H.M.King approved the design 'in bronze' surely they wouldn't use some inferior alloy, after he approved it?

(There is, incidentally, some correspondence in The Times where the deputy Master of the Mint answers criticism of poor quality reproduction, but no mention of the material.)

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one wondering what this fellow's medal was doing in a field? I wonder where his family is at and whether they would like to see that item returned to them, if they are in fact still around.

-Daniel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...