tootrock Posted 19 November , 2009 Posted 19 November , 2009 Were campaign medals issued to all ranks who served overseas? Ancestry does not seem to show an MIC for Douglas Haig! What was the highest rank to qualify. Martin
27thBN Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Well all ranks from as said Field Marshall D Haig to Pte F Burke and all in between.Maybe his MIC card is missing i have a few chaps also that are missing their MICs as well MC
David B Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 The only card on Earl Haig is a M.I.D. award card. David
27thBN Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 yes you are correct i also had a look, did find french ,rawlinson and others Mids they are also in services of officers 1920 as well they would be .Probably taken out ?? MC
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Kitchener is on Ancestry. 1 of Rawlinson's MiDs on Ancestry On UK National Archives site: French, J D P Corps Regiment No Rank Expeditionary Force Field Marshal Catalogue reference WO 372/7 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documen...p;resultcount=1 Haig, Sir D Corps Regiment No Rank 17th Lancers Lieutenant General Staff Field Marshal Catalogue reference WO 372/8 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documen...p;resultcount=1 Rawlinson, Henry Seymour Corps Regiment No Rank Major General General WO 372/16 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documen...;resultcount=10 The UK National Archives listings are still more comprehensive than Ancestry.
Stebie9173 Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 There is a story of the "famous" MICs being removed from the cabinets some time between the NA digitisation and the Ancestry digitisation, and never making it back again.... Steve.
Muerrisch Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Your actual Majesty [as Alf Garnett might have said] outranked the FMs and he got the odd gong.
Chris_Baker Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Haig's MIC is no different to most other Old Contemptibles. 14 Star, BWM, Victory. Clasp & roses. Emblem. Of course, the back is not shown on the DocsOnline version. Wonder what happened to it? Perhaps we'll see it on eBay one day.
jon_armstrong Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Kitchener is on Ancestry. What is it indexed as? I looked for him last night and couldn't find him... only his nephew HEC Kitchener who succeeded him to the Earldom.
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 What is it indexed as? Earl Kitchener, Rank Field Marshal. On the back indicates that there had also been an enquiry about a 1914 Star for Lord Roberts.
jon_armstrong Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Ah got it now, thanks. Had expected to see him under his given name rather than his title. I guess the clerk who filled out the card thought that was too familiar!
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 His title was his correct name and in a heirarchical society it was not unusual for it to be used. The idea of being familiar with a Field Marshal, let alone an earl was unlikely to occur to most clerks in their writing.
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 Your actual Majesty [as Alf Garnett might have said] outranked the FMs and he got the odd gong. Indeed so and his MIC has been previously posted to the forum. As have lesser fry like WS Churchill and David Lloyd George.
David B Posted 20 November , 2009 Posted 20 November , 2009 At least they are a bit eglitarian here. No matter what rank they are just in alphabetical order, like everyone else David
per ardua per mare per terram Posted 21 November , 2009 Posted 21 November , 2009 Your actual next crowned Majesty [King George VI] is on the naval medal roll, but his BWM & VM were issued by the RAF.
whiterose Posted 24 November , 2009 Posted 24 November , 2009 I did wonder if all the top people mentioned had to apply for their medals like other officers. What I have found interesting although off topic are the MICs for a certain B L Montgomery of the Royal Warwickshire Regiment.
27thBN Posted 29 November , 2009 Posted 29 November , 2009 interesting about kitchener mic being under this title well done that man for finding it MC
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now