PhilB Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 Image details Description Medal card of Locking, Walter East Corps Regiment No Rank Army Service Corps TS/1307 Sarwal Army Service Corps TS/1307 Acting Corporal Date 1914-1920 Catalogue reference WO 372/12 Anyone familiar with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Clifton Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 Hello Phil It's a new one on me, but assuming that it isn't a transcription error it might be a term borrowed from the Indian Army for someone like a camel-driver or a handler of certain types of supplies. Any evidence that he served in one of the Middle East theatres? Ron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auchonvillerssomme Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 I would think that Sarwal is a rank in the Indian Army - There are quite a few British names with this rank in the NA MIC rolls. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documen...mp;mediaarray=* Mick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingo794 Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 Never come accross 'Sarwal', but 'Sarwan' was a rank in the Indian Army. Driver or Trooper. I have seen a number of Camel Corps medals with this rank. Spelled this way 'SARWAN'. DW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingo794 Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 I tried Googling 'Sarwal' and it came up with nothing. Though, 'Sarwan' is given as a rank. DW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveE Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 I would think that Sarwal is a rank in the Indian Army - There are quite a few British names with this rank in the NA MIC rolls. It looks like most, if not all, of the British names with this rank on NA are transcription errors, Locking for example appears to have been a Farrier. Others are mistranscriptions of Serjeant, Sapper etc. The Indian names with the rank of Sarwal are also mistranscribed, they read Sarwan on the cards. Regards Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bingo794 Posted 21 August , 2009 Share Posted 21 August , 2009 The Indian names with the rank of Sarwal are also mistranscribed, they read Sarwan on the cards. Regards Steve ................Sarwan is on the medals, is the stamping wrong I wonder? I think I have seen Sarwan listed on medal sales lists, but not Sarwal. The chap who knows his stuff on this line is Jim Strawbridge. Cheers Steve. DW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Strawbridge Posted 22 August , 2009 Share Posted 22 August , 2009 I think that SteveE has hit it on the head. It is almost certainly a transcription error. A Sarwan was normally a camel driver in the Indian Army. I have only seen this rank to those with an Indian name. In the link provided by auchonvillerssomme to the National Archives all of the British names but one shows Sarwal... (with dots) as if there is a transcription problem. Williamson shows Sarwal and Sarwan as seemingly the same interchangeable rank. The name of Sarwar and Sarwan are fairly common Indian family names - both forenames or surnames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 22 August , 2009 Author Share Posted 22 August , 2009 Thank you, gents. Would a British camel driver in the ASC have been termed a Sarwan when serving in India or with an Indian unit? I suspect that (at that time) they wouldn`t relish being called Indian names? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Clifton Posted 22 August , 2009 Share Posted 22 August , 2009 In the link provided by auchonvillerssomme to the National Archives all of the British names but one shows Sarwal... (with dots) as if there is a transcription problem. Hello Jim I don;t think the three dots indicate a transcription problem, if you are referring to the search results list you get with DocumentsOnline. They normally mean that the card refers to service in other units or at a higher rank, e.g. "Private ..." in the Hampshire Regiment, when you click of "See results" might also show him as a Serjeant in the Hampshires, or as a Sapper in the RE. Ron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now