Simon Jones Posted 2 April , 2009 Posted 2 April , 2009 Can anyone give me a good translation for ‘Schützenhöhlen’, the German corrugated iron shelters also called Siegfried shelters? Obviously I can work out a literal translation but none of them really sound right. thanks
SiegeGunner Posted 2 April , 2009 Posted 2 April , 2009 Unless the construction of the shelter is the subject of the sentence, I would just call it a dugout. The German half-round corrugated 'liner' is similar to the British elephant shelter, and both were used to construct cut-and-covered and mined dugouts. Straining to include all the technical nuances of German terms that are not central to the meaning of the sentence can make your text extremely cumbersome and distract from the main message. Mick
JimSmithson Posted 2 April , 2009 Posted 2 April , 2009 I agree with Mick. If I were translating the other way 'dug out' would not make much sense to a German if I said ausgegraben. Protective cave might sound poetic but not in a sentence about where you found troops during a bombardment for example. Jim
Simon Jones Posted 2 April , 2009 Author Posted 2 April , 2009 Unless the construction of the shelter is the subject of the sentence, Yes it is! The whole chapter is on dugouts. This is the sentence: "These were little more than shelters and prefabricated galvanised corrugated iron sheets were introduced for this purpose known Schützenhöhlen (**** *****) or Siegfried shelters."
SiegeGunner Posted 2 April , 2009 Posted 2 April , 2009 In that case, Simon, use the German term. The sentence reads absolutely fine as you quote it. Perhaps also get in the fact that they were semi-circular/half-round (assuming that's the type they were). An explanation, as you have, followed by the German term is useful to the reader as it gives them the original term, in case they meet it again. Mick
Simon Jones Posted 2 April , 2009 Author Posted 2 April , 2009 Mick & Jim Thanks - I just wanted to explain the German term. I'll be using a drawing as well so they'll get the shape. S
nigelfe Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Bombardment shelter would a reasonble and fairly literal translation.
john jerome mcmanus Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 G'day all, I have very little grounding in German but 'schutzen is a form of the noun/verb shoot and I imagine hohlen is in the same form for hole. Whether this means a hole to shoot from or a hole to take cover from shooting I cannot answer. Where are our German speakers? Regards Pop
truthergw Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 You have just read posts from German speakers. Schutzen also carries the meaning of protect.
SiegeGunner Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 A 'Schütze' is a rifleman/infantryman and a 'Höhle' is a cave or a burrow/den etc of an animal (or a similar man-made structure). A 'Schützenloch' is a 'rifle pit' or 'foxhole'. If this kind of 'Schützenhöhle' is just a half-round corrugated-iron shrapnel/splinter shelter (like the top part of an Anderson shelter), simply standing on the surface of the ground (as used in elastic defence zones later in the war), then perhaps 'lightweight infantry shelter' will cover it. Mick PS Tom is correct that the verb 'schützen' means 'to protect', from which come various words beginning or ending with 'Schutz-' or '-schutz', relating to protection/defence.
egbert Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Yes it is! The whole chapter is on dugouts. This is the sentence: "These were little more than shelters and prefabricated galvanised corrugated iron sheets were introduced for this purpose known Schützenhöhlen (**** *****) or Siegfried shelters." A very unique word which I have never heard in all my "German" life. I can abstract the word but it is still not good "old" German language. I wonder where the author has the term found and thus using it in his book/essay. At first hand I tend to believe that he actually means something like Schutzhoehle which makes a little more "German" language sense. So here you guys have a German point of view.
Simon Jones Posted 3 April , 2009 Author Posted 3 April , 2009 This is it, from Der Stellungskrieg by F. Seesselberg (Berlin 1926).
egbert Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Ok you and the f+$%^&*ing author means something like a Schutzloch. And what you have depicted now, I would translate "dug-out" Period
egbert Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 P.S. dug-out = der Unterstand. (Sesselburg always used "strange" word combinations)
truthergw Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Ok you and the f+$%^&*ing author means something like a Schutzloch. And what you have depicted now, I would translate "dug-out" Period Hi Egbert. I am desperately searching through my Langenscheidt for f+$%^&*ing and can't find it. Is there an umlaut missing, perhaps?
SiegeGunner Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 I agree with Egbert that this word is not one commonly found in period sources, but it does appear in the General Staff (Intelligence) Vocabulary of German Military Terms (1918 - reprinted by the IWM 1995), which is based on terms encountered in captured German documents. As I suggested in post #2, I would generally translate it as 'dugout' (same as 'Unterstand'), although, in the example illustrated, it's actually more of a high-tech funk hole. Incidentally, if the belief that this was called a 'Siegfried shelter' comes from Abb.98 'Schützenhöhle aus der Siegfried- und Wotanstellung', that may be an inference too far – Siegfried and Wotan being sectors of the Hindenburg Line.
Robert Dunlop Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Simon, thanks very much for the images. Now I can see why you are having some difficulty. These were not dugouts in the usual sense of the word, at least as most commonly assigned to deep relatively spacious underground living accommodations, etc. Schützenhöhlen were small, up to 3 man, buried shelters. Were they used for accommodation as well as temporary shelter, presumably, during bombardments? Robert ... more of a high-tech funk hole.Mick, that's it. Robert
Simon Jones Posted 3 April , 2009 Author Posted 3 April , 2009 Robert I am pretty certain they were introduced when the new defensive regulations prohibited deep and large dugouts in the front line. There is a good passage in Copse 125 pp. 17-20. The sections could also be used for inclined dugout entrances. I think I have seen them in the Vosges but can't lay my hands on my photos at present. S
egbert Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Ernst Juenger's episodes of Waeldchen 125 (copse 125) happened in 1918, far away from the Siegfried line. They were figthing in the old 1914 front line trenches. The 3 pages in question about dug-outs in the book Waeldchen 125 (German edition!!!!) call the dug-outs they take shelter in as either "Unterstand" or "Siegfriedbunker". Nothing else!
Robert Dunlop Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 Simon, they are entirely consistent with a policy of distributing defensive resources, rather than concentrating them. The British adapted in this way too, hence the elephant shelters. Egbert, thanks very much for checking on Juenger's original text! Robert
Jack Sheldon Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 At the risk of being rebuked for advertising, have a look in my German Army at Passchendaele (available in all good libraries!). I included a photo of one of these things and I would not describe it as a dugout. It could be made splinterproof if enough earth was dumped on it, but it was open at one end and was primarily intended to be protection from the elements. Jack
truthergw Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 I have a notion that in the very early days, scoops out of the side of the trench were known by the British as dugouts. I am kneedeep in books on a different theme but I will try to look out a captioned picture when I get the chance. Funkholes have been mentioned and I believe this is the same thing.
SiegeGunner Posted 3 April , 2009 Posted 3 April , 2009 I included a photo of one of these things and I would not describe it as a dugout. It could be made splinterproof if enough earth was dumped on it, but it was open at one end and was primarily intended to be protection from the elements. I see two pix, Jack - one on the fourth page of photos and one on the final page. Both are of a half-round structure similar to (but smaller than) an elephant shelter (and identical to field shelters for pigs kept outdoors in more recent times), the first parked up against a bank and the second two buried. That is what I was expecting before Simon posted the drawing, which is perplexing as the corrugated iron lining is arched. What your pics show is what I would call a small infantry shelter, but Simon's Abb. 98 is more of a luxury funk-hole. Obviously the prefab corrugated iron structure could be used in various ways. Perhaps we could call it a dug-in ...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now