Chris_Baker Posted 31 March , 2004 Share Posted 31 March , 2004 According to the service papers of a soldier I am studying, he was “compulsorily and temporarily” transferred to join 199 Company of the Labour Corps on 10 August 1918. This was authorised under Army Council Instruction 916. Was this a medical downgrading, or an organisational thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ian Bowbrick Posted 31 March , 2004 Share Posted 31 March , 2004 This would have been a medical issue as 199 Coy was an original unit of the Labour Corps formed in April 1917. Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivor Lee Posted 2 April , 2004 Share Posted 2 April , 2004 Chris Am just catching up with the Forum after a few days shopping in Edinburgh!! I have not got a copy of ACI 916 for either 1917 or 1918. So either I have missed one relating to the Labour Corps or it is a general ACI. I have not copied each of the ACI's that laid down which unit a man should be put in on enlistment. However as he was transferred these ACI's would not apply to him - I take it he was transferred from another unit? You have me intrigued! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 2 April , 2004 Share Posted 2 April , 2004 Talking of tranfers to the Labour Corps - I am part way through trawling through the latest MIC releases for the 9th King's Liverpool Regt and I am intigued by the number who transferred. Are there any number blocks available to show me which Labour Corps units these men went to initially, based on their new service number, or can any other information be gleaned from these numbers? I'm not able to get to the NA for some time and when I do time might not allow me to look for the papers of many of these men. Regards, Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ian Bowbrick Posted 2 April , 2004 Share Posted 2 April , 2004 Ken, Info can be gleaned from numbers - what is the series? Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 Info can be gleaned from numbers - what is the series? Ian, I have 40 men so far who served in the Labour Corps after serving in the 9th King's. The numbers vary from 118***, all 6-digit numbers but mostly starting with 5 or 6. Regards, Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ian Bowbrick Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 Ken, If their Labour Corps numbers are 118*** (?), unit information will be forthcoming when I get to my paperwork this evening, as they were original members of the Corps. Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 If their Labour Corps numbers are 118*** (?), unit information will be forthcoming when I get to my paperwork this evening, as they were original members of the Corps. The 118*** number is 118523 - Pte Jonathon V A BRAID. The next two men on my list have consecutive numbers - 224403 & 224403. Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muerrisch Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 The next two men on my list have consecutive numbers - 224403 & 224403. thats what I call consecutive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivor Lee Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 Ken 118523 is, as Ian said, one of the original Labour Corps men and would put him in 198 Company. 224403 is slightly later (July 1917?) and puts him in 247 or 248 Company. The 500000 and 600000 series date from 1918. Not so easy to link to a specific company, often they are men who were in PoW Companies but not always! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 The next two men on my list have consecutive numbers - 224403 & 224403. thats what I call consecutive! Well spotted, LB. Since they weren't identical twins, I can only cringe and admit that I cut and paste the number rather than type it twice. If only I'd remembered to change the last digit it would have read "224403 & 224404". Now, where's my book of plausible excuses? Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 6 April , 2004 Share Posted 6 April , 2004 118523 is, as Ian said, one of the original Labour Corps men and would put him in 198 Company. 224403 is slightly later (July 1917?) and puts him in 247 or 248 Company. The 500000 and 600000 series date from 1918. Not so easy to link to a specific company, often they are men who were in PoW Companies but not always! Thanks Ivor, This information is quite useful for putting their transfers into perspective. When were 198 and the other original companies formed? Can a date be ascertained for the following: 325057 332010 375286 375447 390804 I also have about 10 men in the 400000 series covering the whole range. Is there a reference work that can be consulted to learn more about these transfers and number blocks? thanks again, Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivor Lee Posted 7 April , 2004 Share Posted 7 April , 2004 Ken The original units were formed about 14 May 1917. There is some question about the exact date for some units. Have a look at the thread Ian started "Happy Birthday Labour Corps". ACI 611 of 1917 gives the regimental numbers for the original Labour Corps companies (1 to 203, 295 to 358, No 1 to 42 Group and the 7 Labour Battalions) but these only give details for regimental numbers from 1to about 186,000) After 186,000 there are no surviving records. That is one reason why I am building up my own database. 325057 probably company around 350 but not certain 332010 probably Western Command Labour Centre 375286 cannot link to specific company 375447 cannot link to specific company 390804 cannot link to specific company The trouble is that men were issued their number on transfer to the LC and then sent to their unit. In many cases the number was issued at the Labour Centre so a whole block of men would be issued with numbers and then sent to whichever unit needed men! Some of the 400000 series can be attributed to specific companies. Let me have the numbers and I will check for you. You may be lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 1 May , 2004 Share Posted 1 May , 2004 Ivor, Thanks for that information. Looking again at the 37**** series numbers, whilst you can't link them to specific companies because of the way numbers were issued beofre men were sent to individual units, is it possible to make an educated guess at the dates of transfer? I am thinking particularly of a man who transferred into the Labour Corps and was given the number 372051. Regards, Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivor Lee Posted 2 May , 2004 Share Posted 2 May , 2004 Ken, Off the top of my head I would say September/October 1917. Ivor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Lees Posted 2 May , 2004 Share Posted 2 May , 2004 Ivor, Thanks for the reply. I will have to add this man to my list of PRO targets when I finally make it to Kew. Regards, Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Stillyards Posted 3 May , 2004 Share Posted 3 May , 2004 Ivor, Im researching an S Bilton (17/899) 17th Bn Northumberland Fusiliers, later moved to Labour Corps with service number 493837. Would be very interested if you could hazard a guess from his number as to when he may have made the switch to the Labour Corps. 17th Northumberland was a pioneer unit raised from railway workers around Hull. Do you know if this unit was transferred to LC or would it have been individuals? Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivor Lee Posted 3 May , 2004 Share Posted 3 May , 2004 Kevin I think the transfer would have been during September/October 1917. Originally I thought it was later but have recently come across two men with numbers in the 500000 series who joined the LC in September 1917. I will be interested to see what you can find out about him. So far I cannot place him in a specific Company. As far as I am aware it was a case of individual transfer and not a large group from his Battalion. Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now