Guy Ellis Posted 23 January , 2009 Share Posted 23 January , 2009 I have seen this term used and wonder if there is any pattern for it being used, was it always to do with sickness or would there be some other reason to asign this to a man's record If illness what was considered the main 'natural cause' killers in the field Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim_Grundy Posted 23 January , 2009 Share Posted 23 January , 2009 I think this subject has been discussed at some length elsewhere in the Forum. Try a search to see what you can find. Generally, 'died' applies to any death that was not due to enemy action, whether that was illness, accident or even suicide. However, there are instances when some deaths, where the actual circumstances were unclear, being recorded as 'died' in the absence of any other evidence. Were you trying to establish what happened to a particular serviceman? If so, there are plenty of knowledgeable types around who might be able to help. Regards, Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now