PhilB Posted 9 January , 2009 Share Posted 9 January , 2009 Was Masefield the official historian of Haig`s army (and, if so, what did he publish apart from The Old Front Line & Gallipoli?) or is this a slight exaggeration for an American readership? http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/...9679C946996D6CF Prospect of Labor's Ruling British Parliament; Official Historian of Haig's Army, John Masefield, Talks About Politics, Battle Scenes, German Unrest, Peace Outlook, and After-the-War Problems E-MAIL Save By MONTROSE J. MOSES. Jan 27, 1918, Sunday Section: The New York Times Magazine, Page 65, 4384 words Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartH Posted 9 January , 2009 Share Posted 9 January , 2009 Very interesting I'm not aware aware of him working for the CID at the time, nor was he working with Sir John Fortescue. Wiki suggests he had no access to Official Documents Clickty Click, though it suggests he was asked by the Head of Military Intelligence to write a book, but during the war that would not be an Official History. I'm off out soon but will do some more research later. The Somme book was "The Old Front Line" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Gorst Posted 9 January , 2009 Share Posted 9 January , 2009 QUOTE (Phil_B @ Jan 9 2009, 06:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Was Masefield the official historian of Haig`s army (and, if so, what did he publish apart from The Old Front Line & Gallipoli?) or is this a slight exaggeration for an American readership? http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/...9679C946996D6CF Prospect of Labor's Ruling British Parliament; Official Historian of Haig's Army, John Masefield, Talks About Politics, Battle Scenes, German Unrest, Peace Outlook, and After-the-War Problems E-MAIL Save By MONTROSE J. MOSES. Jan 27, 1918, Sunday Section: The New York Times Magazine, Page 65, 4384 words Phil - See here - http://ies.sas.ac.uk/cmps/Projects/Masefie...ciety/jmsws.htm Not sure he was an official historian in the sense we would now understand it but certainly seems to have some official connection - I think one of his tours in the US was undertaken under the auspices of the Foreign Office (although I can't remember where I read this ). Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 9 January , 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January , 2009 Thanks, gents. It looks like "official" may have meant "asked by Haig". Such was Masefield’s triumph (ie his Gallipoli book) that an invitation was received from Sir Douglas Haig to write the chronicle of the Somme. Whitehall bureaucracy eventually forced Masefield to abandon the original plan and the Somme chronicle eventually appeared as two truncated volumes: The Old Front Line and The Battle of the Somme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthergw Posted 9 January , 2009 Share Posted 9 January , 2009 Well, if the CiC asks you to write a book that is pretty official? It would certainly qualify as authorised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilB Posted 9 January , 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January , 2009 Yes it would. It`s not quite what we usually mean though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now