Jock Bruce Posted 5 February , 2003 Share Posted 5 February , 2003 Anybody know what reason for discharge was covered by sub-para xx ? I've got a list of some but not this one. Jock Bruce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NeilYork Posted 5 February , 2003 Share Posted 5 February , 2003 Jock King's Regulations & Orders for The Army 1912 (Re-printed with Amendments published in Army Orders up to 1st August 1914) Para 392 (xx) Inefficiency after 18 years' service (with a view to pension under the Pay Warrant) Neil York Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jock Bruce Posted 6 February , 2003 Author Share Posted 6 February , 2003 Neil thanks - that fits very well Jock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now