Jump to content
Free downloads from TNA ×
The Great War (1914-1918) Forum

Remembered Today:

Unusual trench 'art'!


Michael Pegum

Recommended Posts

This odd item is made from a brass cartridge. The outside diameter of the cartridge (not the rim) is 81mm. The bullets are 8mm, not 0.303in (but see later post: this is wrong). The badge is, presumably, from an artillery cap-badge. On the base, the visible letters are:

BBC.R 7 SDE SL 16 C (edited)

The questions are: what nationality is it, and what gun was it for?

Michael

post-3328-020448300 1293882416.jpg

Here are the bullets forming the legs, and the base.

post-3328-067760300 1293882785.jpg

post-3328-018434600 1293882825.jpg

And the badge

post-3328-038019600 1293882906.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a minature coal scuttle made from a french 75 mm catridge. This is a fairly common item of trench art. Hopefully a headstamp expert will be able to say where the cartridge was manufactured

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a minature coal scuttle made from a french 75 mm catridge. This is a fairly common item of trench art. Hopefully a headstamp expert will be able to say where the cartridge was manufactured

Dave

As Dave says, the shell case is a French 75mm for the M1897 field gun. However, I can't tell you the manufacturer, as that is not my area of knowledge.

With regards to the bullets forming the legs, those are not French 8mm Balle D bullets. The Lebel bullet is solid copper and does not have a cannelure (groove) around the base as those do. I am fairly certain they are in fact .303 Mark VII bullets that are just a bit dirty. If so, they should have cupro-nickel envelopes (silver coloured) with a bit of a clean.

Regards

TonyE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With regards to the bullets forming the legs, those are not French 8mm Balle D bullets. The Lebel bullet is solid copper and does not have a cannelure (groove) around the base as those do. I am fairly certain they are in fact .303 Mark VII bullets that are just a bit dirty. If so, they should have cupro-nickel envelopes (silver coloured) with a bit of a clean.

Regards

TonyE

Yes, on more careful measurement, they are 7.7mm, which is 0.303", and they do have a silver surface where clean. So, British badge (I put this thread on 'Arms' as well) and British bullets on a French cartridge. Sorted!

Thanks, Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these "bullets" part of a complete round and still in at least a part of the cartridge case? They look like it. If so, then the cartridge neck doesn't look like a .303 which, I seem to recall, was crimped three times. The bullet did not have a groove at the neck. If these are the entire round, then where is the neck of the cartridge? Antony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they are just projectiles without any part of the cartridge case being present.

...and yes, all British ball bullets had a cannelure just below the neck, that was where the three neck crimps were secured.

Regards

TonyE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Tony. The memory grows as dim as the eyes. Antony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Wasn't sure which of the two threads about this to post on! I have an item of trench art, an ash tray fashioned out of a shell with a similar badge. I was told it was Royal Artillery by the seller (Antique Fair)

ash.jpg

ash2.jpg

Noticed a vesta case on ebay with the same badge, also described as 'Royal Artillery'

What sort of shell would mine have been made out of?

Read somewhere (can't remember where) that blacksmith's behind the lines often made these

Caryl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't sure which of the two threads about this to post on! I have an item of trench art, an ash tray fashioned out of a shell with a similar badge. I was told it was Royal Artillery by the seller (Antique Fair)

Noticed a vesta case on ebay with the same badge, also described as 'Royal Artillery'

What sort of shell would mine have been made out of?

Read somewhere (can't remember where) that blacksmith's behind the lines often made these

Caryl

This looks to have been made from a WW2 Fuze cover. These covers were supplied with the fuzes for the 3.7 inch AA guns, and were commonly made into ashtrays and pin trays, often with a badge attached. Artillery being the most common in my experience.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two ashtrays like yours Caryl, but mine have what I believe to be buttons on the side. These buttons have the same Royal Artillery badge.

When mine are turned upside down the cones on the inside have been cut short and sealed with 1940 pennies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you CGM and John

So it's war art but not trench art. At least I know now

Back to the drawing board; thought I'd found a nice piece to start off my collection of trench art!

Caryl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caryl - it all depends. In actuality, Nick Saunders (an authority on these things), would still classify it as Trench Art, even if it wasn't made in the trenches (which is the norm), and even if it was made well after the war. So it still stands as 'Trench Art'.

Your piece could still be Great War in age. As mentioned, its a fuze cover, but such covers were used in the Great war too; it all depends on the size and shape. Starting out as a cone, the cone was cut through and inverted, to make a small ash tray affair. They are pretty common, and often have a Royal Artillery badge. In your case, the badge is likely to be a senior NCO's arm badge (which had a gun, but no crown), rather than a cap badge.

Hope this helps

Best wishes

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Peter, that does indeed help! I'll view it as a start to my collection in that case.

I always examine brass objects just in case but not so much around these days. I can remember years ago seeing more items of trench art, but at the time I had a distinct aversion to brass after cleaning so much of it as a child and I grew to hate the smell of Brasso!

Caryl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trouble with trench art is, you either love it or hate it. I sit on the boundary, though I have a sizable collection of trench art letter openers (for some reason; see my contribution to the thread on holdalls above); but my specimen of the coal scuttle is rather unloved, I'm afraid. Keep looking, they do turn up, but the prices are all over the place.

Best

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caryl - it all depends. In actuality, Nick Saunders (an authority on these things), would still classify it as Trench Art, even if it wasn't made in the trenches (which is the norm), and even if it was made well after the war. So it still stands as 'Trench Art'.

Your piece could still be Great War in age. As mentioned, its a fuze cover, but such covers were used in the Great war too; it all depends on the size and shape. Starting out as a cone, the cone was cut through and inverted, to make a small ash tray affair. They are pretty common, and often have a Royal Artillery badge. In your case, the badge is likely to be a senior NCO's arm badge (which had a gun, but no crown), rather than a cap badge.

Hope this helps

Best wishes

Peter

Yes it's definitely Trench Art.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...