chrisharley9 Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 This may be of interest to those on the forum Name: SYKES, Sir MARK Initials: M Nationality: United Kingdom Rank: Lieutenant Colonel Regiment/Service: Yorkshire Regiment Unit Text: 5th Bn. Age: 39 Date of Death: 16/02/1919 Additional information: 6th Bart. Commander of the Order of St. Stanislas (Russia). Order of the Star of Roumania. Son of the late Sir Tatton Sykes and Lady Jessica Sykes; husband of Lady Edith Sykes, of Sledmere, Malton, Yorks. M.P. for Central Hull since 1911. J.P. Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead Grave/Memorial Reference: In the North-East part. Cemetery: SLEDMERE (ST. MARY) CHURCHYARD BBC News Today The news item shows that his body was repatriated from France Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryn_Hammond Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 This may be of interest to those on the forum Name: SYKES, Sir MARK Initials: M Nationality: United Kingdom Rank: Lieutenant Colonel Regiment/Service: Yorkshire Regiment Unit Text: 5th Bn. Age: 39 Date of Death: 16/02/1919 Additional information: 6th Bart. Commander of the Order of St. Stanislas (Russia). Order of the Star of Roumania. Son of the late Sir Tatton Sykes and Lady Jessica Sykes; husband of Lady Edith Sykes, of Sledmere, Malton, Yorks. M.P. for Central Hull since 1911. J.P. Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead Grave/Memorial Reference: In the North-East part. Cemetery: SLEDMERE (ST. MARY) CHURCHYARD BBC News Today The news item shows that his body was repatriated from France Chris If he "was working for the government in the Middle East where he helped draw up the national boundaries that still exist in the region today," he is the originator of the Sykes-Picot Agreement (cf 'Lawrence of Arabia' (dir. David Lean) for more ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Broomfield Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 So it's his fault, then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryn_Hammond Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 So it's his fault, then. Well, him and a French chap ... oh, and possibly a Russian ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potter Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 He is the British half of the Sykes Picot Agreement. Georges Picot was a Frenchman Phil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stiletto_33853 Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 His entry in Who was Who, Volume 2, 1916-1928 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryn_Hammond Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 He is the British half of the Sykes Picot Agreement. Georges Picot was a Frenchman Phil Echo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stiletto_33853 Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 continued, next page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 16 September , 2008 Share Posted 16 September , 2008 Surely there is a Major Difference between a Body being repatriated during warfare and that of being Shipped Home at what was effectively the End of Hostilities.The Peace Treaty may not have been concluded,but surely this does not constitute the repatriation of a Soldier.Sykes was a Politician,and is buried in Sledmere...There is a previous thread on the Forum regarding the Waggoners War Memorial...(Fikk as Feeves..PBI) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swizz Posted 17 September , 2008 Share Posted 17 September , 2008 There is an article about this in today's Independent: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/he...ave-933046.html Swizz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisharley9 Posted 17 September , 2008 Author Share Posted 17 September , 2008 PBI Sir Mark as a serving officer was not entitled to repatriation as this was against the policy of the time - Im sure TD will be able to give us chapter & verse on this Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisharley9 Posted 17 September , 2008 Author Share Posted 17 September , 2008 Swizz thanks for the link - In a way he is still serving in a way that may save millions Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank_East Posted 18 September , 2008 Share Posted 18 September , 2008 He is the British half of the Sykes Picot Agreement. Georges Picot was a Frenchman Phil There was to be a great deal of British hostility towards the secret agreement even though the French and British had approved of the agreement in May 1916.Some might say that both sides thought that the Middle East was theirs alone to argue over.Sykes personality traits was described as enthusiastic, energetic and frequently impractical.T.E Lawrence recorded that "He saw the odd in everything, and missed the even.He would sketch out in a few dashes a new world, all out of scale, but vivid as a vision of some of the sides of the thing we hoped" Lawrence was reflecting his love of Arabia and his concern for the treatment of the Arabs while Lord Curzon, the F.S was concerned at the "gains" of the French in the Middle East and was confident that the Arabs preferred British protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry_Reeves Posted 18 September , 2008 Share Posted 18 September , 2008 Sykes was a serving officer, a Lt Col in the Yorkshire Regiment, and was commanding 5th Battalion in 1914. He saw no active service in the war however. His expertise, in Middle Eastern affairs in particular, was felt better put to use at the War Office. The confusion mentioned over his status above however, comes as no suprise as it was a source of some concern in an acrimonious dispute between the Treasury via the Ministry of Pensions, and the Foreign Office. The Treasury,and the Ministry of Pensions , who awarded Lady Syke's pension on the death of her husband, argued that this was the cost should fall on the Foreign Office who was, by the FO's admittance, being paid by them whilst on his special military mission on their behalf, As a serving officer however, the FO argued that as a serving officer, the Treasury was responsible and if they were to insist on this course of argument, that Lady Sykes should pay back the money paid to him by the FO. All parties forgetting of course that she was recently widowed with six children, whatever her social status. Read all about it at the NA in T1/12427 TR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisharley9 Posted 23 September , 2008 Author Share Posted 23 September , 2008 For Terry Denham Is this officer new to your list of repariations? Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PBI Posted 24 September , 2008 Share Posted 24 September , 2008 I would have thought that Lady Sykes could have very,very, easily have Borne all the Costs and Expenses accrued in bringing her Husbands Body Home,after all the Sykes Family were not short of a Bob or Two.No Doubt the added Bonus of having Friends in High Places would have helped no end to smooth the Process,as for awarding Her a Pension..a total Joke !! She didnt need the Money.I bet that She and none of Her 6 Children ended up in the Workhouse or had to rely on Handouts from the Parish.Rant Over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Denham Posted 26 September , 2008 Share Posted 26 September , 2008 Chris Yes. I have him recorded and you are right in that, technically, he should not have been repatriated. This was immediately after actual hostilities had ceased (though legally the war was still going on) and a couple of such repatriations of high profile people occured - no doubt influence played a part. Had he been a humble private or second lieutenant, he would have remained in France. The rules were not always as rigid as they should have been in those early years (dependant upon who you were) especially if the location was not actually a war zone. However, we are talking about a tiny number of cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now